Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23209151›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2012

Regulating DNA replication in plants.

Maria de la Paz Sanchez, Celina Costas, Joana Sequeira-Mendes, Crisanto Gutierrez

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Journey to the Core of the Plant Cell Cycle.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Plant DNA Polymerases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Rescuing stalled or damaged replication forks.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
  16. Endoreplication.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria de la Paz SanchezCentro de Biologia Molecular "Severo Ochoa," CSIC-UAM, Nicolas Cabrera 1, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Celina Costas
Joana Sequeira-Mendes
Crisanto Gutierrez
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal DNA replication in plants has requirements and constraints similar to those in other eukaryotes. However, some aspects are plant-specific. Studies of DNA replication control in plants, which have unique developmental strategies, can offer unparalleled opportunities of comparing regulatory processes with yeast and, particularly, metazoa to identify common trends and basic rules. In addition to the comparative molecular and biochemical studies, genomic studies in plants that started with Arabidopsis thaliana in the year 2000 have now expanded to several dozens of species. This, together with the applicability of genomic approaches and the availability of a large collection of mutants, underscores the enormous potential to study DNA replication control in a whole developing organism. Recent advances in this field with particular focus on the DNA replication proteins, the nature of replication origins and their epigenetic landscape, and the control of endoreplication will be reviewed.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsDNA ReplicationEpigenesis, GeneticGeminiviridaeGenomicsPlant Physiological PhenomenaPlant ProteinsReplication OriginSpecies SpecificityCell Cycle ProteinsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23209151
PMCPMC3504439
OpenAlexW2125771203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.