Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23209149›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2012

Hematopoiesis.

Michael A Rieger, Timm Schroeder

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. mCells · 2025
    Review
  10. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Hierarchies as Novel Biomarkers of Drug Response in Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Review
  11. A Neutrophil Storage Pool in the Fetal Liver is the Principal Source of the Postnatal Neutrophil Surge.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael A RiegerGeorg-Speyer-Haus, Institute for Biomedical Research, Frankfurt (Main), Germany.
Timm Schroeder
Georg Speyer Haus · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enormous numbers of adult blood cells are constantly regenerated throughout life from hematopoietic stem cells through a series of progenitor stages. Accessibility, robust functional assays, well-established prospective isolation, and successful clinical application made hematopoiesis the classical mammalian stem cell system. Most of the basic concepts of stem cell biology have been defined in this system. At the same time, many long-standing disputes in hematopoiesis research illustrate our still limited understanding. Here we discuss the embryonic development and lifelong maintenance of the hematopoietic system, its cellular components, and some of the hypotheses about the molecular mechanisms involved in controlling hematopoietic cell fates.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageEmbryonic DevelopmentHematopoiesisHumansMiceSignal TransductionStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID23209149
PMCPMC3504436
OpenAlexW4211259900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.