Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23208584›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2013

MRI and CT of anal carcinoma: a pictorial review.

Massimo Tonolini, Roberto Bianco

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review of Various Perianal Lesions on CT and MRI.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Anal Cancer: The Past, Present and Future.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. MRI evaluation of anal and perianal diseases.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Massimo TonoliniDepartment of Radiology, "Luigi Sacco" University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milan, Italy, mtonolini@sirm.org.
Roberto Bianco

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSquamocellular anal carcinoma is increasingly diagnosed in patients with risk factors.

methodsState-of-the-art imaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using phased-array coils and volumetric multidetector computed tomography (CT) provides detailed visualisation of anal disorders, identification and extent assessment of neoplastic tissue, detection and characterisation of nodal and visceral metastases. MRI has been recommended by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) as the preferred modality of choice to stage anal cancer, taking into account the maximum tumour diameter, invasion of adjacent structures and regional lymph node involvement.

resultsCross-sectional imaging techniques allow the identification of coexisting complications, and differentiation from other perineal abnormalities.

conclusionCross-sectional imaging is useful for planning radiotherapy, surgical drainage or salvage abdomino-perineal resection. After chemo-radiotherapy, MRI follow-up provides confident reassessment of therapeutic response, persistent or recurrent disease. TEACHING POINTS : • Anal carcinoma is increasingly diagnosed in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), anoreceptive intercourse, chronic inflammatory bowel disease. • An established association exists with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and premalignant intra-epithelial dysplasia. • Phased-array MRI is recommended as the preferred imaging modality for regional staging. • Imaging allows detection of infectious complications, planning of radiotherapy or salvage surgery. • Follow-up MRI allows reliable assessment of therapeutic response after chemo-radiotherapy.

Identifiers

PMID23208584
PMCPMC3579995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.