Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23208314›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2013

Comparison of conditioning regimens of various intensities for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT using HLA-identical sibling donors in AML and MDS with <10% BM blasts: a report from EBMT.

R Martino, L de Wreede, M Fiocco, A van Biezen, P A von dem Borne, R-M Hamladji, L Volin, M Bornhäuser, M Robin, V Rocha and 4 more

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Is There (Still) a Place for Sequential Conditioning?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

R MartinoHematology Department, Division of Clinical Hematology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. rmartino@santpau.cat
L de Wreede
M Fiocco
A van Biezen
P A von dem Borne
R-M Hamladji
L Volin
M Bornhäuser
M Robin
V Rocha
T de Witte
N Kröger
M Mohty
Acute Leukemia Working Party the subcommittee for Myelodysplastic Syndromes of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European group for Blood Marrow Transplantation Group (EBMT)
Leiden University Medical Center · NLHôpital Saint-Louis · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRHelsinki University Hospital · FIKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik · DERadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this multicenter retrospective study, the long-term outcomes of 878 adults with AML and refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) with BM blasts <10% who underwent transplantation with an HLA-identical sibling donor between 1998 and 2004 were analyzed according to four regimens of conditioning intensity: reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) (either intermediate RIC (IntermRIC) or non-myeloablative (NMA) RIC), and myeloablative conditioning (MC) in 718 patients (either conventional MC or hyperintense MC. In multivariate cox analysis, patients undergoing NMA transplantation had lower non-relapse mortality risk in the first 100 days after transplantation (P<0.01), but a higher risk beyond day +100 (P=0.02), as well as higher relapse incidence in the first 12 months (P<0.01), but the risk was similar in all groups beyond 12 months. The probabilities of PFS and OS up to 7 years were significantly lower only in the NMA subgroup (P0.01 for both). The 7-year OS was 53%, 29%, 56% and 51%, respectively. Our data suggest that prospective studies comparing RIC regimens (especially IntermRIC) with MC are appropriate in patients with AML and RAEB who are in a non-advanced disease status.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationSiblingsTissue DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedAllograftsAnemia, Refractory, with Excess of BlastsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23208314
OpenAlexW2157002292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.