ArticleIrish journal of medical science2013
Percutaneous renal artery angioplasty and stenting: indications, technique and results.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPercutaneous interventions for renal arterial disease can be used to treat a variety of conditions including both atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (RAS) as well as endovascular management of renal artery aneurysms (RAA).
aimWe sought to examine the indications, techniques and results of percutaneous renal angioplasty and stenting in our institution over a 6-year period and review the current evidence for practice.
methodsPatient demographics, procedure indications, technical procedural details, complications, baseline and follow-up renal profile indices were analysed.
resultsThe most common indication for intervention was atherosclerotic RAS (69.2%) followed by RAS secondary to fibromuscular dysplasia (15.3%) and RAA (15.3%). There was a 100% technical success in our cohort of patients. The majority of patients (84.6%) had cross-sectional imaging in the form of computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography prior to intervention.
conclusionWhen performed in appropriate settings following close liaison with referring physicians, percutaneous renal angioplasty and stenting remains an important treatment modality for renovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.