Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23207649›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2013

Impact of technical training on rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) in group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.

N Toepfner, P Henneke, R Berner, M Hufnagel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis I. Diagnostics and nonsurgical management.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2016
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N ToepfnerClinic and Polyclinic for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
P Henneke
R Berner
M Hufnagel
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid antigen detection tests (RADT) are widely used for the rapid diagnosis of group A streptococcal (GAS) tonsillopharyngitis. In a prospective 3-year study, the reliability of two different RADT methods was compared, as performed by lab technicians versus physicians. Sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values, were calculated. When performed by physicians, the results (44.4 %, 8.3 %, 26.7 % and 16.7 %) of a latex agglutination test (LAT) were unacceptably low. However, after switching to a lateral-flow immunoassay (LFIT) and implementing additional hands-on training, the performance improved dramatically (100 %, 92.6 %, 84.6 % and 100 %). In conclusion, technical errors, along with a lack of experience and expertise, negatively impact RADT accuracy.

Indexed as

Antigens, BacterialHumansImmunoassayLatex Fixation TestsMedical Laboratory PersonnelMedical Laboratory SciencePharyngitisPhysiciansProspective StudiesReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificityStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus pyogenesTonsillitisAntigens, BacterialReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID23207649
OpenAlexW2072691406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.