Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23206442›Full record

ReviewMutation research

Tumor-specific microsatellite instability: do distinct mechanisms underlie the MSI-L and EMAST phenotypes?

Suzanne E Hile, Samion Shabashev, Kristin A Eckert

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mutation research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Low microsatellite instability revisited: a review.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma a with yolk sac tumor in a 41-year-old woman: a case report.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne E HileDepartment of Pathology, Gittlen Cancer Research Foundation, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Samion ShabashevDepartment of Pathology, Gittlen Cancer Research Foundation, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Kristin A EckertDepartment of Pathology, Gittlen Cancer Research Foundation, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA. Electronic address: kae4@psu.edu.
Pennsylvania State University · USCancer Research Foundation · US

Funding

Computational and Biochemical Analysis of Microsatellite Life CycleR01GM087472 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI ECKERT, KRISTIN A, MAKOVA, KATERYNA · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
DNA replication, DNA repair and microsatellite stabilityR01CA100060 · NCI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI ECKERT, KRISTIN A · 2005 to 2009
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA100060NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100060NIGMS NIH HHS GM087472NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsatellite DNA sequences display allele length alterations or microsatellite instability (MSI) in tumor tissues, and MSI is used diagnostically for tumor detection and classification. We discuss the known types of tumor-specific MSI patterns and the relevant mechanisms underlying each pattern. Mutation rates of individual microsatellites vary greatly, and the intrinsic DNA features of motif size, sequence, and length contribute to this variation. MSI is used for detecting mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient tumors, which display an MSI-high phenotype due to genome-wide microsatellite destabilization. Because several pathways maintain microsatellite stability, tumors that have undergone other events associated with moderate genome instability may display diagnostic MSI only at specific di- or tetranucleotide markers. We summarize evidence for such alternative MSI forms (A-MSI) in sporadic cancers, also referred to as MSI-low and EMAST. While the existence of A-MSI is not disputed, there is disagreement about the origin and pathologic significance of this phenomenon. Although ambiguities due to PCR methods may be a source, evidence exists for other mechanisms to explain tumor-specific A-MSI. Some portion of A-MSI tumors may result from random mutational events arising during neoplastic cell evolution. However, this mechanism fails to explain the specificity of A-MSI for di- and tetranucleotide instability. We present evidence supporting the alternative argument that some A-MSI tumors arise by a distinct genetic pathway, and give examples of DNA metabolic pathways that, when altered, may be responsible for instability at specific microsatellite motifs. Finally, we suggest that A-MSI in tumors could be molecular signatures of environmental influences and DNA damage. Importantly, A-MSI occurs in several pre-neoplastic inflammatory states, including inflammatory bowel diseases, consistent with a role of oxidative stress in A-MSI. Understanding the biochemical basis of A-MSI tumor phenotypes will advance the development of new diagnostic tools and positively impact the clinical management of individual cancers.

Indexed as

Microsatellite InstabilityDNA Mismatch RepairHumansMutationNeoplasmsPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID23206442
PMCPMC3610773
OpenAlexW2054392352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.