Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23205065›Full record

ArticleMental health in family medicine2011

Hypertension associated with neurocognitive performance among persons with type 2 diabetes: a brief report.

David L Mount

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mental health in family medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David L MountAssistant Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section on General Internal Medicine and Director of Community Outreach, Partnerships and Advocacy, Maya Angelou Center for Health Equity; Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Among persons with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) it is not known whether the presence of hypertension could have a detrimental effect on learning ability and whether repeated exposure to information changes the amount of information retained. The aim of this study was to determine cross-sectional evidence for a differential burden to cognitive functioning among persons with T2DM and comorbid hypertension (HTN).Methods This study performed a cross-sectional, retrospective analysis, by medical chart review, of patients with a diagnosis of T2DM.Results Medical records information for history of HTN, age, gender and cognitive performance scores were recorded and analysed for 112 T2DM patients, with an average age of 60 years (SD = 13.84). Differences in cognitive performance scores were compared between patients with and without a history of HTN. The results show that participants who were diagnosed with hypertension produced lower average Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test scores than individuals who are not diagnosed with hypertension. Trial 2 was the only trial to prove significant with a P-value of 0.041.Conclusions Our results support previous studies showing that HTN is associated with increased risk to learning and memory functioning, although the degree of interference with these cognitive functions could not be determined from our research. Recognising that people diagnosed with HTN may be at risk for poorer learning and memory skills, future research can investigate how the length of time with the diseases affects learning and memory, and how medication management can attenuate cognitive learning and memory performance.

Indexed as

cognitive functionhypertensionlearningmemorytype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID23205065
PMCPMC3487601
OpenAlexW54349122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.