Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23204897›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical cardiology2012

Genetic variations of α-cardiac actin and cardiac muscle LIM protein in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in South India.

Advithi Rangaraju, Deepa Selvi Rani, Ml Satyanarayana, Narasimhan Calambur, Nalla Swapna, Pratibha Nallari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. NovelPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Novel Mutations in β-CJC open · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Advithi RangarajuDepartment of Genetics, Osmania University;
Deepa Selvi Rani
Ml Satyanarayana
Narasimhan Calambur
Nalla Swapna
Pratibha Nallari
Osmania University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a disease of the heart muscle, with an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. It is also known as the 'disease of the sarcomere', and is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Mutations in the sarcomeric genes have been largely implicated in the manifestation of HCM. Modifier genes and environmental factors, along with causative mutation, add to the cumulative effect of the disease.

methodsIn the present study, the role of the cardiac actin gene and the cardiac muscle LIM protein as contributors to HCM - through genetic variation - has been elucidated by screening the entire coding region in 100 control and 100 HCM subjects through polymerase chain reaction-based single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and direct sequencing.

resultsThe authors could not find any novel or reported exonic variations in any of the genes in the studied population; however, intronic variations were revealed in the cardiac actin gene through direct sequencing. A case of compound heterozygosity was observed in a patient with a variation in intron 1, along with a novel heterozygous mutation in exon 7 (S215L) of α-tropomyosin.

conclusionsThe particular genes are highly conserved, and account for only 1.5% of HCM cases. They do not seem to play a major role in the genesis of HCM in the present population, thus confirming earlier reports of conserved sequences and ethnicity.

Indexed as

Alpha-tropomyosinCardiac actinCardiac muscle LIM proteinHypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Identifiers

PMID23204897
PMCPMC3383364
OpenAlexW29776254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.