Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23204646›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of supercomputing2012

Protein Simulation Data in the Relational Model.

Andrew M Simms, Valerie Daggett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of supercomputing, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. DIVE: a data intensive visualization engine.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew M SimmsBiomedical and Health Informatics Program, University of Washington, Box 355013, Seattle, WA 98195-5013.
Valerie Daggett

Funding

University of Washington Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Research Training ProgramT15LM007442 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN H. GENNARI, Andrea L. Hartzler · 2002 to 2026
$19.6M
MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF PROTEIN UNFOLDINGR01GM050789 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAGGETT, VALERIE D · 2000 to 2014
$3.9M
MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS OF PROTEIN UNFOLDINGR29GM050789 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAGGETT, VALERIE D · 1995 to 1999
–
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050789NIGMS NIH HHS R29 GM050789NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High performance computing is leading to unprecedented volumes of data. Relational databases offer a robust and scalable model for storing and analyzing scientific data. However, these features do not come without a cost-significant design effort is required to build a functional and efficient repository. Modeling protein simulation data in a relational database presents several challenges: the data captured from individual simulations are large, multi-dimensional, and must integrate with both simulation software and external data sites. Here we present the dimensional design and relational implementation of a comprehensive data warehouse for storing and analyzing molecular dynamics simulations using SQL Server.

Identifiers

PMID23204646
PMCPMC3507464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.