Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23204090›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Dental Association (1939)2012

The prevalence of questionable occlusal caries: findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Sonia K Makhija, Gregg H Gilbert, Ellen Funkhouser, James D Bader, Valeria V Gordan, D Brad Rindal, Michael Bauer, Daniel J Pihlstrom, Vibeke Qvist, National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Efficacy of PScientific reports · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A dual handheld SWIR transillumination/reflectance probe for imaging lesions on tooth occlusal and proximal surfaces.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A system for simultaneous near-infrared reflectance and transillumination imaging of occlusal carious lesions.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sonia K MakhijaDepartment of Clinical and Community Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Dentistry, 1720 2nd Ave. South, SDB 111, Birmingham, AL 35294-0007, USA. smakhija@uab.edu
Gregg H Gilbert
Ellen Funkhouser
James D Bader
Valeria V Gordan
D Brad Rindal
Michael Bauer
Daniel J Pihlstrom
Vibeke Qvist
National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group

Funding

The National Dental PBRNU19DE022516 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2012 to 2018
$66.4M
Dental PBRN Network ChairU01DE016747 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2005 to 2011
$17.3M
Dental Practice-Based Research Network Coordinating CtrU01DE016746 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FUNKHOUSER, ELLEN M · 2005 to 2011
$7.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016746NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016747NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-16746NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-16747NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE022516NIDCR NIH HHS U19-DE-22516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuestionable occlusal caries (QOC) can be defined as clinically suspected caries with no cavitation or radiographic evidence of occlusal caries. To the authors' knowledge, no one has quantified the prevalence of QOC, so this quantification was the authors' objective in conducting this study

methodsA total of 82 dentist and hygienist practitioner-investigators (P-Is) from the United States and Denmark in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) participated. When patients seeking treatment had at least one unrestored occlusal surface, P-Is quantified their number of unrestored occlusal surfaces and instances of QOC, if applicable. P-Is also recorded information about characteristics of patients who had QOC and had provided informed consent. The authors adjusted for patient clustering within practices.

resultsOverall, 6,910 patients had at least one unrestored occlusal surface, with a total of 50,445 unrestored surfaces. Thirty-four percent of all patients and 11 percent of unrestored occlusal tooth surfaces among all patients had QOC. Patient- and surface-level QOC prevalences varied significantly according to DPBRN region (P < .001 and P = .03, respectively). The highest percentages for patient- and surface-level prevalence occurred in Florida and Georgia (42 percent and 16 percent, respectively).

conclusionsTo the authors' knowledge, this is the first study in which investigators have quantified the prevalence of QOC in routine clinical practice. These results document a high prevalence overall, with wide variation in prevalence among The DPBRN's five main regions. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: QOC is common in routine practice and warrants further investigation regarding how best to manage it.

Indexed as

BicuspidCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkDental CariesFemaleHumansMaleMolarPrevalenceTooth CrownUnited StatesWhite People

Identifiers

PMID23204090
PMCPMC3513777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.