Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23204083›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Dental Association (1939)2012

Bisphenol A and other compounds in human saliva and urine associated with the placement of composite restorations.

Albert Kingman, Jeffrey Hyman, Scott A Masten, Beby Jayaram, Cynthia Smith, Frederick Eichmiller, Michael C Arnold, Paul A Wong, James M Schaeffer, Sheetal Solanki and 1 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A Systematic Review of Exposure to Bisphenol A from Dental Treatment.JDR clinical and translational research · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Albert KingmanCenter for Clinical Research, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-4878, USA. KingmanA@de45.nidr.nih.gov
Jeffrey Hyman
Scott A Masten
Beby Jayaram
Cynthia Smith
Frederick Eichmiller
Michael C Arnold
Paul A Wong
James M Schaeffer
Sheetal Solanki
William J Dunn

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 ES999999PHS HHS HHSN-291-2005-55552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBisphenol A (BPA) and other related chemical compounds may be components used in the manufacturing process of resin-based composite dental restorative material. The purpose of the authors' study was to assess salivary and urinary concentrations of BPA and other compounds before and after placement of resin-based composite dental restorations.

methodsThe authors collected saliva and urine from 172 participants receiving composite restorations before and as long as 30 hours after placement of composite restorations. The authors analyzed saliva specimens from 151 participants and urine specimens from 171 participants for concentrations of BPA and five related compounds by using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS).

resultsSalivary concentrations of BPA and some related compounds increased immediately (within one hour) after composite placement. Salivary concentrations of BPA and most study compounds returned to prerestoration levels within eight hours after composite placement. With the exception of a 43 percent increase in BPA, concentrations of the study compounds in urine returned to prerestoration levels nine to 30 hours after restoration placement. Concentrations in saliva were lower when a rubber dam was used; however, rubber dam use appeared to have no effect on urinary concentrations of the measured compounds during the study period. The authors observed similar changes in study compound levels in both saliva and urine between participants who received anterior restorations and those who received posterior restorations.

conclusionsPlacement of resin-based composite restorations was associated with detectable increases in saliva of BPA and other study compounds within one hour after restoration placement and an increased concentration of BPA in urine nine to 30 hours after restoration placement. Rubber dam use did not reduce the absorption of BPA (measured as BPA level in urine) during the study. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Additional studies are needed to address how long BPA levels in urine associated with composite placement remain elevated to aid in better understanding of the clearance rates of BPA and other study compounds.

Indexed as

Dental Restoration, PermanentAcrylic ResinsAdultBenzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsChromatography, LiquidComposite ResinsDental MaterialsEpoxy CompoundsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMass SpectrometryMethacrylatesPhenols4,4'-isopropylidenediphenol dimethacrylateAcrylic ResinsBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A Compoundsbisphenol A diglycidyl etherComposite ResinsDental MaterialsEpoxy CompoundsEsthet-XFiltek Z250HeliomolarHeliomolar HBMethacrylatesPhenolsPolyethylene GlycolsPolymethacrylic AcidsPolyurethanestetric flow composite resintriethylene glycol dimethacrylate

Identifiers

PMID23204083
PMCPMC12266333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.