ReviewStroke2013
Stroke risk calculators in the era of electronic health records linked to administrative databases.
Review in Stroke, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction models for incident stroke in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive performance.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of cardiovascular diseases risk calculators for CVDs prevention and management: scoping review.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Stroke in young adults: Current trends, opportunities for prevention and pathways forward.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2020Review
- A rule-based electronic phenotyping algorithm for detecting clinically relevant cardiovascular disease cases.BMC research notes · 2017Article
- Population-based Stroke Atlas for outcome prediction: method and preliminary results for ischemic stroke from CT.PloS one · 2014Article
- Synergistic effects of elevated homocysteine level and abnormal blood lipids on the onset of stroke.Neural regeneration research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.