Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23203873›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2013

New functional families (FunFams) in CATH to improve the mapping of conserved functional sites to 3D structures.

Ian Sillitoe, Alison L Cuff, Benoit H Dessailly, Natalie L Dawson, Nicholas Furnham, David Lee, Jonathan G Lees, Tony E Lewis, Romain A Studer, Robert Rentzsch and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ian SillitoeInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Alison L Cuff
Benoit H Dessailly
Natalie L Dawson
Nicholas Furnham
David Lee
Jonathan G Lees
Tony E Lewis
Romain A Studer
Robert Rentzsch
Corin Yeats
Janet M Thornton
Christine A Orengo

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F010451/1Medical Research CouncilNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201200026CWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CATH version 3.5 (Class, Architecture, Topology, Homology, available at http://www.cathdb.info/) contains 173 536 domains, 2626 homologous superfamilies and 1313 fold groups. When focusing on structural genomics (SG) structures, we observe that the number of new folds for CATH v3.5 is slightly less than for previous releases, and this observation suggests that we may now know the majority of folds that are easily accessible to structure determination. We have improved the accuracy of our functional family (FunFams) sub-classification method and the CATH sequence domain search facility has been extended to provide FunFam annotations for each domain. The CATH website has been redesigned. We have improved the display of functional data and of conserved sequence features associated with FunFams within each CATH superfamily.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinProtein Structure, TertiaryGenomicsInternetMolecular Sequence AnnotationProtein FoldingProteinsSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, ProteinStructural Homology, ProteinProteins

Identifiers

PMID23203873
PMCPMC3531114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.