Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23203301›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2013

Colistin resistance in gram-negative bacteria during prophylactic topical colistin use in intensive care units.

Evelien A N Oostdijk, Loek Smits, Anne Marie G A de Smet, Maurine A Leverstein-van Hall, Jozef Kesecioglu, Marc J M Bonten

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04431934 (Open-label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy of a Probiotic or Fecal Microbiota Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04431934 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Open-label, Randomized Study to Assess the Efficacy of a Probiotic or Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) on the Eradication of Rectal Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacilli (MDR-GNB) Carriage (PROFTMDECOL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Clinic of BarcelonaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled437ConditionsCARRIER STATEArmsPROBIOTIC, FMT REGIMEN
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dynamics of colistin and tobramycin resistance amongAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Antibiotic stewardship in the intensive care unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2014
    Review
  18. Article
  19. SDD and colistin resistance: end of a dream?Intensive care medicine · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Evelien A N OostdijkDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, G04.614, PO box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. E.A.N.Oostdijk@umcutrecht.nl
Loek Smits
Anne Marie G A de Smet
Maurine A Leverstein-van Hall
Jozef Kesecioglu
Marc J M Bonten

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTopical use of colistin as part of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) has been associated with improved patient outcome in intensive care units (ICU), yet little is known about the risks of colistin resistance. We quantified effects of selective decontamination on acquisition of colistin-resistant gram-negative bacteria (GNB) using data from a cluster-randomized study and a single-centre cohort.

methodsAcquisition of colistin-resistant GNB and conversion from susceptible to resistance in GNB was determined in respiratory samples [from patients receiving SDD (n = 455), SOD (n = 476), or standard care (SC) (n = 315)], and in rectal swabs from 1,840 SDD-patients. Genotyping of converting isolates was performed where possible.

resultsThe respiratory tract acquisition rates of colistin-resistant GNB were comparable during SDD, SOD, and SC and ranged from 0.7 to 1.1/1,000 patient-days at risk. Rectal acquisition rates during SDD were <3.3/1,000 days at risk. In patients with respiratory tract GNB carriage, conversion rates were 3.6 and 1.1/1,000 patient-days at risk during SDD and SC, respectively, (p > 0.05). In patients with rectal GNB carriage conversion rates during SDD were 5.4 and 3.2/1,000 days at risk and 15.5 and 12.6/1,000 days at risk when colonized with tobramycin-resistant GNB.

conclusionsAcquisition rates with colistin-resistant GNB in the respiratory tract were low and comparable with and without topical use of colistin. Rates of acquisition of colistin-resistant GNB during SDD were--in ICUs with low endemicity of antibiotic resistance--<2.5/1,000 days at risk, but were fivefold higher during persistent GNB colonization and 15-fold higher during carriage with tobramycin-resistant GNB.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAdministration, TopicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesColistinDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGastrointestinal TractGenotypeGram-Negative BacteriaHumansIntensive Care UnitsMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsOropharynxRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRectumAnti-Bacterial AgentsColistin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.