Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23202969›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2012

A bead-based multiplexed immunoassay to evaluate breast cancer biomarkers for early detection in pre-diagnostic serum.

Annemieke W J Opstal-van Winden, Wendy Rodenburg, Jeroen L A Pennings, Conny T M van Oostrom, Jos H Beijnen, Petra H M Peeters, Carla H van Gils, Annemieke de Vries

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Use of latex microbeads for detection of Plasmodium vivax lactate dehydrogenase using flow cytometry.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2025
    Article
  5. Serum Direct Bilirubin as a Biomarker for Breast Cancer.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2024
    Article
  6. Diagnostic applications of microsphere-based flow cytometry: A review.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Annemieke W J Opstal-van WindenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.vangils@umcutrecht.nl.
Wendy Rodenburg
Jeroen L A Pennings
Conny T M van Oostrom
Jos H Beijnen
Petra H M Peeters
Carla H van Gils
Annemieke de Vries
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLSlotervaartziekenhuis · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates whether a set of ten potential breast cancer serum biomarkers and cancer antigens (osteopontin (OPN), haptoglobin, cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), prolactin, cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), α-fetoprotein (AFP), leptin and migration inhibitory factor (MIF)) can predict early stage breast cancer in samples collected before clinical diagnosis (phase III samples). We performed a nested case-control study within the Prospect-EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition) cohort. We examined to what extent the biomarker panel could discriminate between 68 women diagnosed with breast cancer up to three years after enrollment and 68 matched healthy controls (all 56-64 years at baseline). Using a quantitative bead-based multiplexed assay, we determined protein concentrations in serum samples collected at enrollment. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Random Forest (RF) analysis revealed that on the basis of all ten proteins, early cases could not be separated from controls. When we combined serum protein concentrations and subject characteristics related to breast cancer risk in the RF analysis, this did not result in classification accuracy scores that could correctly classify the samples (sensitivity: 50%, specificity: 50%). Our findings indicate that this panel of selected tumor markers cannot be used for diagnosis of early breast cancer.

Indexed as

AgedAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoembryonic AntigenCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesDemographyFemaleFetal ProteinsHaptoglobinsHumansImmunoassayMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOsteopontinAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic AntigenFetal ProteinsHaptoglobinsOsteopontinProlactin

Identifiers

PMID23202969
PMCPMC3497343
OpenAlexW2112060104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.