Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23202731›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical investigation2013

Lysosomal disruption preferentially targets acute myeloid leukemia cells and progenitors.

Mahadeo A Sukhai, Swayam Prabha, Rose Hurren, Angela C Rutledge, Anna Y Lee, Shrivani Sriskanthadevan, Hong Sun, Xiaoming Wang, Marko Skrtic, Ayesh Seneviratne and 28 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Mahadeo A SukhaiPrincess Margaret Hospital/the Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Swayam Prabha
Rose Hurren
Angela C Rutledge
Anna Y Lee
Shrivani Sriskanthadevan
Hong Sun
Xiaoming Wang
Marko Skrtic
Ayesh Seneviratne
Maria Cusimano
Bozhena Jhas
Marcela Gronda
Neil MacLean
Eunice E Cho
Paul A Spagnuolo
Sumaiya Sharmeen
Marinella Gebbia
Malene Urbanus
Kolja Eppert
Dilan Dissanayake
Alexia Jonet
Alexandra Dassonville-Klimpt
Xiaoming Li
Alessandro Datti
Pamela S Ohashi
Jeff Wrana
Ian Rogers
Pascal Sonnet
William Y Ellis
Seth J Corey
Connie Eaves
Mark D Minden
Jean C Y Wang
John E Dick
Corey Nislow
Guri Giaever
Aaron D Schimmer
University of Toronto · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CABC Cancer Agency · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite efforts to understand and treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML), there remains a need for more comprehensive therapies to prevent AML-associated relapses. To identify new therapeutic strategies for AML, we screened a library of on- and off-patent drugs and identified the antimalarial agent mefloquine as a compound that selectively kills AML cells and AML stem cells in a panel of leukemia cell lines and in mice. Using a yeast genome-wide functional screen for mefloquine sensitizers, we identified genes associated with the yeast vacuole, the homolog of the mammalian lysosome. Consistent with this, we determined that mefloquine disrupts lysosomes, directly permeabilizes the lysosome membrane, and releases cathepsins into the cytosol. Knockdown of the lysosomal membrane proteins LAMP1 and LAMP2 resulted in decreased cell viability, as did treatment of AML cells with known lysosome disrupters. Highlighting a potential therapeutic rationale for this strategy, leukemic cells had significantly larger lysosomes compared with normal cells, and leukemia-initiating cells overexpressed lysosomal biogenesis genes. These results demonstrate that lysosomal disruption preferentially targets AML cells and AML progenitor cells, providing a rationale for testing lysosomal disruption as a novel therapeutic strategy for AML.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimalarialsCell SurvivalFemaleGene Knockdown TechniquesGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansIntracellular MembranesK562 CellsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLysosomal-Associated Membrane Protein 1Lysosomal-Associated Membrane Protein 2Lysosomal Membrane ProteinsLysosomesMaleMefloquineAntimalarialsLAMP1 protein, humanLamp1 protein, mouseLAMP2 protein, humanLysosomal-Associated Membrane Protein 1Lysosomal-Associated Membrane Protein 2Lysosomal Membrane ProteinsMefloquine

Identifiers

PMID23202731
PMCPMC3533286
OpenAlexW2049422105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.