Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23201592›Full record

Trial reportGynecologic oncology2013

Is bilateral lymphadenectomy for midline squamous carcinoma of the vulva always necessary? An analysis from Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 173.

Robert L Coleman, Shamshad Ali, Charles F Levenback, Michael A Gold, Jeffrey M Fowler, Patricia L Judson, Maria C Bell, Koen De Geest, Nick M Spirtos, Ronald K Potkul and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gynecologic oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detection of sentinel lymph node in vulvar cancer usingArchives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cancer of the vulva: 2025 update: FIGO Cancer Report 2025.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  5. Effect of known pathological risk factors on the incidence of metastatic lymph nodes and survival in early-stage vulvar cancer: SEER analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cancer of the vulva: 2021 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR VULVAR CANCER.Acta clinica Croatica · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Therapy for Primary Vulvar Carcinoma.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Comprehensive management of vulvovaginal cancers.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

Robert L ColemanThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. rcoleman@mdanderson.org
Shamshad Ali
Charles F Levenback
Michael A Gold
Jeffrey M Fowler
Patricia L Judson
Maria C Bell
Koen De Geest
Nick M Spirtos
Ronald K Potkul
Mario M Leitao
Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Emma C Rossi
Samuel S Lentz
James J Burke
Linda Van Le
Cornelia L Trimble
Indiana University Bloomington · USJohns Hopkins University · USLoyola University Chicago · USMayo Clinic · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMercer University · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USUniversity of South Dakota · USUniversity of South Florida · USWake Forest University · USWomen's Cancer Center of Nevada · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUPU10CA101165 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 2003 to 2014
$43.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA 27469NCI NIH HHS CA 37517NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA101165
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine which patients with near midline lesions may safely undergo unilateral groin dissection based on clinical exam and lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) results.

methodsPatients participating in GOG-173 underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) localization with blue dye, and radiocolloid with optional LSG before definitive inguinal-femoral lymphadenectomy (LND). This analysis interrogates the reliability of LSG alone relative to primary tumor location in those patients who had an interpretable LSG and at least one SLN identified. Primary tumor location was categorized as lateral (>2cm from midline), midline, or lateral ambiguous (LA) if located within 2cm, but not involving the midline.

resultsTwo-hundred-thirty-four patients met eligibility criteria. Sixty-four had lateral lesions, and underwent unilateral LND. All patients with LA (N=65) and midline (N=105) tumors underwent bilateral LND. Bilateral drainage by LSG was identified in 14/64 (22%) patients with lateral tumors, 38/65 (58%) with LA tumors and in 73/105 (70%) with midline tumors. At mapping, no SLNs were found in contralateral groins among those patients with LA and midline tumors who had unilateral-only LSGs. However, in these patients groin metastases were found in 4/32 patients with midline tumors undergoing contralateral dissection; none were found in 27 patients with LA tumors.

conclusionThe likelihood of detectable bilateral drainage using preoperative LSG decreases as a function of distance from midline. Patients with LA primaries and unilateral drainage on LSG may safely undergo unilateral SLN.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesLymphoscintigraphyProspective StudiesSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyVulvar Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID23201592
PMCPMC3638213
OpenAlexW2135611215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.