ArticleGynecologic oncology2013
Genotyping human papillomaviruses: development and evaluation of a comprehensive DNA microarray.
Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Sample-In-Answer-Out Microfluidic System for the Molecular Diagnostics of 24 HPV Genotypes Using Palm-Sized Cartridge.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Solid and Suspension Microarrays for Microbial Diagnostics.Methods in microbiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
goalsTo define the analytical and clinical performance of a human papillomavirus (HPV) custom-designed microarray targeting the HPV L1 gene for viral genotyping.
methodsMicroarray probes were designed by cataloging the genome sequence of all 120 known HPV types to generate tiling probes using eArray® software against the unique L1 capsid gene segments targeted by MY09/11 and FAP59/64 primers. The microarray (1 slide×8 arrays×60K features) synthesized in situ by inkjet printing was tested using synthetic type-specific HPV DNA and existing HPV DNA from cervical cytology. The synthetic HPV L1 segments (genotypes 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 53, 58, 66, 73, 83) were manufactured from sequences stored in the NCBI taxonomy database. Using the hybridization patterns of the synthetic HPV DNA as the Support Vector Machine classifier, HPV DNA from patient samples were genotyped and compared to antecedent DNA sequencing/BLAST® results for concordance.
results16 cytology-derived HPV DNA samples and 13 synthetic type-specific HPV DNA samples were tested singly, in duplicate, or in combination on 40 arrays. The synthetic HPV DNA hybridization patterns were found to be uniquely distinctive to serve well as a classifier of unknown HPV-containing specimens. For the 16HPV DNA+ samples classified, 15 were concordant with DNA sequencing results. In 6/16 (38%) samples, the microarray hybridization pattern revealed ≥2 concurrent HPV infections.
conclusionThe novel "HPV Array" was sensitive and specific for detecting single and multiple infections. This proof-of-principle project demonstrated the accuracy and advantages of microarray technology for HPV genotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.