Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23200550›Full record

ReviewClinical neurology and neurosurgery2013

Next generation sequencing for neurological diseases: new hope or new hype?

M J Keogh, P F Chinnery

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Detection of genomic rearrangements from targeted resequencing data in Parkinson's disease patients.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Finding FMR1 mosaicism in Fragile X syndrome.Expert review of molecular diagnostics · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M J KeoghMitochondrial Research Group, Newcastle University, UK.
P F Chinnery

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K000608/1Wellcome Trust 096919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past year huge advances have been made in our ability to determine the genetic aetiology of many neurological diseases through the utilisation of next generation sequencing platforms. This technology is, on a daily basis, providing new breakthroughs in neurological disease. The aim of this article is to clearly describe the technological platforms, methods of data analysis, established breakthroughs, and potential future clinical and research applications of this innovative and exciting technique which has relevance to all those working within clinical neuroscience.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalExomeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationNervous System DiseasesSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID23200550
PMCPMC3694302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.