Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23200502›Full record

ReviewLancet (London, England)2012

Ecology of zoonoses: natural and unnatural histories.

William B Karesh, Andy Dobson, James O Lloyd-Smith, Juan Lubroth, Matthew A Dixon, Malcolm Bennett, Stephen Aldrich, Todd Harrington, Pierre Formenty, Elizabeth H Loh and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lancet (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 426 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
426citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
36.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

426 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 885 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. How illegal wildlife trade adheres to and defies conventional market behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

366 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

William B KareshEcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY 10001, USA. karesh@ecohealthalliance.org
Andy Dobson
James O Lloyd-Smith
Juan Lubroth
Matthew A Dixon
Malcolm Bennett
Stephen Aldrich
Todd Harrington
Pierre Formenty
Elizabeth H Loh
Catherine C Machalaba
Mathew Jason Thomas
David L Heymann
EcoHealth Alliance · USChatham House · GBFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · ITLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBOffice of International Affairs · USPrinceton University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 60% of human infectious diseases are caused by pathogens shared with wild or domestic animals. Zoonotic disease organisms include those that are endemic in human populations or enzootic in animal populations with frequent cross-species transmission to people. Some of these diseases have only emerged recently. Together, these organisms are responsible for a substantial burden of disease, with endemic and enzootic zoonoses causing about a billion cases of illness in people and millions of deaths every year. Emerging zoonoses are a growing threat to global health and have caused hundreds of billions of US dollars of economic damage in the past 20 years. We aimed to review how zoonotic diseases result from natural pathogen ecology, and how other circumstances, such as animal production, extraction of natural resources, and antimicrobial application change the dynamics of disease exposure to human beings. In view of present anthropogenic trends, a more effective approach to zoonotic disease prevention and control will require a broad view of medicine that emphasises evidence-based decision making and integrates ecological and evolutionary principles of animal, human, and environmental factors. This broad view is essential for the successful development of policies and practices that reduce probability of future zoonotic emergence, targeted surveillance and strategic prevention, and engagement of partners outside the medical community to help improve health outcomes and reduce disease threats.

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildCommunicable Diseases, EmergingDrug Resistance, MicrobialExtraction and Processing IndustryFood SupplyHIV InfectionsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanPandemicsRisk FactorsZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID23200502
PMCPMC7138068
OpenAlexW1966462823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.