Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23200188›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2013

Advance care planning beyond advance directives: perspectives from patients and surrogates.

Ryan D McMahan, Sara J Knight, Terri R Fried, Rebecca L Sudore

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01550731 (Preparing Older Veterans With Serious and Chronic Illness for Decision Making), which is not on this map. Cited by 94 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01550731 nacompletednot on this map

Preparing Older Veterans With Serious and Chronic Illness for Decision Making

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2012 to 2016Enrolled414ConditionsAgingArmsPREPARE website, Advance directive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for improving health literacy in migrants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Trial
  7. Advance care planning engagement in patients with chronic, life-limiting illness: baseline findings from a cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Advance care planning and end-of-life decision making in dialysis: a randomized controlled trial targeting patients and their surrogates.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2015
    Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Advance care planning for adults with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan D McMahanSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Sara J Knight
Terri R Fried
Rebecca L Sudore

Funding

VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Louise C. Walter · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAdvance care planning (ACP) has focused on documenting life-sustaining treatment preferences in advance directives (ADs). The ADs alone may be insufficient to prepare diverse patients and surrogates for complex medical decisions.

objectivesTo understand what steps best prepare patients and surrogates for decision making.

methodsWe conducted 13 English/Spanish focus groups with participants from a Veterans Affairs and county hospital and the community. Seven groups included patients (n=38), aged ≥65 years, who reported making serious medical decisions. Six separate groups included surrogates (n=31), aged ≥18 years, who made decisions for others. Semistructured focus groups asked what activities best prepared the participants for decision making. Two investigators independently coded data and performed thematic content analysis. Disputes were resolved by consensus.

resultsThe mean±SD patient age was 78±8 years, and 61% were nonwhite. The mean±SD surrogate age was 57±10 years, and 91% were nonwhite. Qualitative analysis identified four overarching themes about how to best prepare for decision making: 1) identify values based on past experiences and quality of life, 2) choose surrogates wisely and verify that they understand their role, 3) decide whether to grant leeway in surrogate decision making, and 4) inform other family and friends of one's wishes to prevent conflict.

conclusionBeyond ADs, patients and surrogates recommend several additional steps to prepare for medical decision making including using past experiences to identify values, verifying that the surrogate understands their role, deciding whether to grant surrogates leeway, and informing other family and friends of one's wishes. Future ACP interventions should consider incorporating these additional ACP activities.

Indexed as

Attitude to DeathAttitude to HealthDecision MakingAdvance Care PlanningAgedCaliforniaConsensusFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePatientsProxyAdvance directivesagingdecision makingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID23200188
PMCPMC4111444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.