ReviewVaccine2012
A review of clinical trials of human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccines.
Review in Vaccine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06536855 (Faster Elimination of HPV Infection and Cervical Cancer Using Concomitant HPV Vaccination and HPV Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 325 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Faster Elimination of HPV Infection and Cervical Cancer Using Concomitant HPV Vaccination and HPV Screening: A Demonstration Project in Rwanda
Who cites it
325 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 739 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness and immunogenicity of single-dose and multi-dose human papillomavirus vaccination: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence of non-vaccine high-risk HPV cervical infections in vaccinated women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Human papillomavirus vaccination uptake and determinant factors among adolescent schoolgirls in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Pooled it
- Uptake and determinants of HPV vaccination in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Pooled it
- Human Papillomavirus 16 E2 as an Apoptosis-Inducing Protein for Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Pooled it
- The cost-effectiveness of bivalent, quadrivalent, and nine-valent HPV vaccination in Asia: a systematic review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Pooled it
- Risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome after vaccination against human papillomavirus: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 1 January 2000 to 4 April 2020.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2022Pooled it
- Updated clinical guideline for human papillomavirus vaccine: the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2021Guideline
- Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- What works for human papillomavirus vaccine introduction in low and middle-income countries?Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2017Pooled it
- Post-hoc analysis of injection-site reactions following vaccination with quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in Japanese female clinical trial participants.Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Trial
- Lot-to-lot consistency study of anHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Trial
- Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of an Escherichia coli-Produced Bivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: An Interim Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2020Trial
- Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of a 9-Valent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Subgroup Analysis of Participants From Asian Countries.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2018Trial
- Are two doses of human papillomavirus vaccine sufficient for girls aged 15-18 years? Results from a cohort study in India.Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Trial
- Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine in Latin American girls, boys, and young women.Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Trial
- Human Papillomavirus vaccine knowledge and recommendation practice among primary care providers, Almaty, Kazakhstan - 2023.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Optimising Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Strategies for Faster Cervical Cancer Elimination.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2026Review
- Projections of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination impact on non-cervical cancer outcomes among women in 117 low- and middle-income countries: a modelling study.BMJ global health · 2026Article
265 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
End of study analyses of the phase III trials of prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines in young women are now largely completed. Two distinct vaccines were evaluated, Gardasil(®) (Merck & Co., Whitehouse Station, NJ USA) a quadrivalent vaccine containing VLPs of types 6, 11, 16 and 18 and Cervarix(®) (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium), a bivalent vaccine containing VLPs of types 16 and 18. Both vaccines exhibited excellent safety and immunogenicity profiles. The vaccines also demonstrated remarkably high and similar efficacy against the vaccine-targeted types for a range of cervical endpoints from persistent infection to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) in women naïve to the corresponding type at the time of vaccination. However, protection from incident infection or disease from non-vaccine types was restricted, and the vaccines had no effect on prevalent infection or disease. Gardasil(®) also demonstrated strong protection against genital warts and vulvar/vaginal neoplasia associated with the vaccine types. In other trials, Gardasil(®) protected mid-adult women from incident infection and CIN caused by the vaccine types and protected men for incident infection, genital warts and anal intraepithelial neoplasia by the vaccine types. Cervarix(®) protected against vaccine-targeted anal infections in women in an end of study evaluation. For practical reasons, efficacy studies have not been conducted in the primary target populations of current vaccination programs, adolescent girls and boys. However, immunogenicity bridging studies demonstrating excellent safety and strong immune responses in adolescence, coupled with the documentation of durable antibody responses and protection in young adults, leads to an optimistic projection of the effectiveness of the vaccines in adolescent vaccination programs. Taken together, the excellent clinical trial results strongly support the potential of the vaccines as high value public health interventions and justify their widespread implementation to prevent anogenital HPV infections and their associated neoplasia. This article forms part of a special supplement entitled "Comprehensive Control of HPV Infections and Related Diseases" Vaccine Volume 30, Supplement 5, 2012.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.