ArticleBiophysical journal2012
The problem of colliding networks and its relation to cell fusion and cancer.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adopted neoplastic cells and the consequences of their existence.Oncotarget · 2023Article
- Generation of Cancer Stem/Initiating Cells by Cell-Cell Fusion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Cell fusion as a link between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, COVID-19 complications, and vaccine side effects.Oncotarget · 2021Article
- Cell-Cell Fusion Mediated by Viruses and HERV-Derived Fusogens in Cancer Initiation and Progression.Cancers · 2021Review
- Review
- Spontaneous cell fusions as a mechanism of parasexual recombination in tumour cell populations.Nature ecology & evolution · 2021Article
- Interneuron Types as Attractors and Controllers.Annual review of neuroscience · 2020Review
- Not just a colourful metaphor: modelling the landscape of cellular development using Hopfield networks.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2016Article
- Article
- The shock of being united and symphiliosis. Another lesson from plants?Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2014Article
- Colliding dynamical complex network models: biological attractors versus attractors from material physics.Biophysical journal · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell fusion, a process that merges two or more cells into one, is required for normal development and has been explored as a tool for stem cell therapy. It has also been proposed that cell fusion causes cancer and contributes to its progression. These functions rely on a poorly understood ability of cell fusion to create new cell types. We suggest that this ability can be understood by considering cells as attractor networks whose basic property is to adopt a set of distinct, stable, self-maintaining states called attractors. According to this view, fusion of two cell types is a collision of two networks that have adopted distinct attractors. To learn how these networks reach a consensus, we model cell fusion computationally. To do so, we simulate patterns of gene activities using a formalism developed to simulate patterns of memory in neural networks. We find that the hybrid networks can assume attractors that are unrelated to parental attractors, implying that cell fusion can create new cell types by nearly instantaneously moving cells between attractors. We also show that hybrid networks are prone to assume spurious attractors, which are emergent and sporadic network states. This finding means that cell fusion can produce abnormal cell types, including cancerous types, by placing cells into normally inaccessible spurious states. Finally, we suggest that the problem of colliding networks has general significance in many processes represented by attractor networks, including biological, social, and political phenomena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.