Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23199802›Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings2012

History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population.

Walter A Rocca, Barbara P Yawn, Jennifer L St Sauver, Brandon R Grossardt, L Joseph Melton

Open access · bronzeAbstract readHistorical ArticlePortraitReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 632 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
632citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
37.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

632 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 778 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Beyond Rurality: Individual Socioeconomic Status and Chronic Disease Prevalence.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

572 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Walter A RoccaDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. rocca@mayo.edu
Barbara P Yawn
Jennifer L St Sauver
Brandon R Grossardt
L Joseph Melton
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USOlmsted Medical Center · US

Funding

Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR01AG034676 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A, ST SAUVER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2010 to 2019
$9.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034676NIA NIH HHS R01-AG034676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) has maintained a comprehensive medical records linkage system for nearly half a century for almost all persons residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Herein, we provide a brief history of the REP before and after 1966, the year in which the REP was officially established. The key protagonists before 1966 were Henry Plummer, Mabel Root, and Joseph Berkson, who developed a medical records linkage system at Mayo Clinic. In 1966, Leonard Kurland established collaborative agreements with other local health care providers (hospitals, physician groups, and clinics [primarily Olmsted Medical Center]) to develop a medical records linkage system that covered the entire population of Olmsted County, and he obtained funding from the National Institutes of Health to support the new system. In 1997, L. Joseph Melton III addressed emerging concerns about the confidentiality of medical record information by introducing a broad patient research authorization as per Minnesota state law. We describe how the key protagonists of the REP have responded to challenges posed by evolving medical knowledge, information technology, and public expectation and policy. In addition, we provide a general description of the system; discuss issues of data quality, reliability, and validity; describe the research team structure; provide information about funding; and compare the REP with other medical information systems. The REP can serve as a model for the development of similar research infrastructures in the United States and worldwide.

Indexed as

Medical Record LinkageAbstracting and IndexingConfidentialityEpidemiologyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedMinnesotaReproducibility of ResultsResearch PersonnelResearch Support as Topic

Identifiers

PMID23199802
PMCPMC3541925
OpenAlexW2120441632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.