Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23199403›Full record

ReviewExpert review of anti-infective therapy2012

Diagnosing malaria in pregnancy: an update.

Michal Fried, Atis Muehlenbachs, Patrick E Duffy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of anti-infective therapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. The Performance of a Rapid Diagnostic Test in Detecting Malaria Infection in Pregnant Women and the Impact of Missed Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michal FriedLaboratory of Malaria Immunology and Vaccinology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Rockville, MD 20892, USA. michal.fried@nih.gov
Atis Muehlenbachs
Patrick E Duffy

Funding

Mali International Center for Excellence in Research: Malaria Clinical ResearchZIAAI001056 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI DUFFY, PATRICK · 2009 to 2024
$43.1M
Malaria Pathogenesis in Pregnant Women and Young ChildrenZIAAI001153 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI FRIED, MICHAL · 2011 to 2025
$9.5M
Preventing Pregnancy Malaria: Maternal-Infant OutcomesU19AI065664 · NIAID · SEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FRIED, MICHAL FRIED · 2005 to 2009
$7.1M
Pathogenesis of falciparum malaria in infancyR01AI052059 · NIAID · SEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DUFFY, PATRICK E · 2001 to 2004
$2.7M
Pregnancy Malaria: Pathogenesis and ImmunityZIAAI001178 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI DUFFY, PATRICK · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI001153NIAID NIH HHS 5U19AI065664NIAID NIH HHS AI52059NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052059NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI065664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy malaria (PM) due to Plasmodium falciparum is a major cause of morbidity and mortality for women and their offspring, but is difficult to recognize and diagnose. During PM, parasites typically sequester in the placenta, whereas peripheral blood smears often appear negative. In addition, many infected women remain asymptomatic, especially in areas of high transmission where systemic immunity is high, although sequelae including maternal anemia and intrauterine growth retardation develop insidiously and increase mortality. New rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have shown promise for malaria diagnosis in nonpregnant individuals, including a product recently approved by the US FDA for use in the USA. However, the sensitivity and specificity of RDTs for diagnosis of PM may be suboptimal. Here, we review the methods that are used to detect or diagnose PM, including blood smear microscopy, RDTs, PCR-based methods, and finally placental histology, which is often cited as the gold standard for use in research studies and clinical trials.

Indexed as

Disease SusceptibilityFemaleHemeproteinsHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornMalaria, FalciparumPlacentaPregnancyPregnancy Complications, HematologicPregnancy Complications, ParasiticPregnancy OutcomeHemeproteinshemozoin

Identifiers

PMID23199403
PMCPMC3552641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.