ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2013
Interaction forces between DPPC bilayers on glass.
Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surface energy and separation mechanics of droplet interface phospholipid bilayers.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- How Well Can You Tailor the Charge of Lipid Vesicles?Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2019Article
- Strain-induced optical changes in demineralized bone.Journal of biomedical optics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The surface force apparatus (SFA) was utilized to obtain force-distance profiles between silica-supported membranes formed by Langmuir-Blodgett deposition of 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC). In the absence of a membrane, a long-range electrostatic repulsion and short-range steric repulsion are measured as a result of the deprotonation of silica in water and the roughness of the silica film. The electrostatic repulsion is partially screened by the lipid membrane, and a van der Waals adhesion comparable to that measured with well-packed DPPC membranes on mica is measured. This finding suggest that electrostatic interactions due to the underlying negatively charged silica are likely present in other systems of glass-supported membranes. In contrast, the charge of an underlying mica substrate is almost completely screened when a lipid membrane is deposited on the mica. The difference in the two systems is attributed to the stronger physisorption of zwitterionic lipids to molecularly smooth mica compared to physisorption to rougher silica.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.