Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23199191›Full record

ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2012

Relationship characteristics associated with sexual risk behavior among MSM in committed relationships.

Colleen C Hoff, Deepalika Chakravarty, Sean C Beougher, Torsten B Neilands, Lynae A Darbes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Colleen C HoffCenter for Research and Education on Gender and Sexuality, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA. choff@sfsu.edu
Deepalika Chakravarty
Sean C Beougher
Torsten B Neilands
Lynae A Darbes
University of California, San Francisco · USSan Francisco State University · US

Funding

Continuation of Longitudinal Gay Couples StudyR01MH075598 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOFF, COLLEEN · 2006 to 2014
$5.2M
Testing a Model of HIV Risk for MenR01MH065141 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOFF, COLLEEN · 2002 to 2006
$2.4M
NIMH NIH HHS MH 65141NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH 75598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding situations that increase HIV risk among men who have sex with men (MSM) requires consideration of the context in which risky behaviors occur. Relationships are one such context. This study examines the presence and predictors of unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) in the past 3 months among 566 MSM couples. A majority of couples allowed sex with outside partners. Overall, 65% of the sample engaged in UAI with primary partner, including nearly half of discordant couples. Positive relationship factors, such as attachment and intimacy, were associated with an increased likelihood of UAI with primary partner. Meanwhile, 22% of the sample engaged in at least one episode of UAI with an outside partner, half of whom were discordant or unknown HIV status outside partners. Higher levels of HIV-specific social support, equality, and sexual agreement investment were significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of engaging in UAI with a discordant or unknown HIV status outside partner. HIV-positive men in discordant relationships had two and one half times the odds of having UAI with a discordant or unknown HIV status outside partner as their HIV-negative partners. Many MSM in relationships, including some in serodiscordant ones, engage in UAI with primary partners. Potential explanations include relationship closeness, relationship length, and agreement type. In addition, relationship context appears to have a differential impact upon UAI with primary and outside partners, implying that prevention messages may need to be tailored for different types of couples. Prevention efforts involving MSM couples must take into account relationship characteristics as couples balance safer sex and HIV risk with intimacy and pleasure.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsHomosexuality, MaleAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCondomsCross-Sectional StudiesHIV SeronegativityHIV SeropositivityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNegotiatingSan FranciscoSexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID23199191
PMCPMC3513980
OpenAlexW2049542545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.