ArticleThe EPMA journal2010
Prevention of gastrointestinal cancer by surveillance endoscopy.
Article in The EPMA journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Migration background and use of preventive healthcare services: Findings of the German Ageing Survey.BMC public health · 2024Article
- A Gratifying Step forward for the Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Endoscopy: A Narrative Review.Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2020Review
- An Augmented Reality Endoscope System for Ureter Position Detection.Journal of medical systems · 2018Article
- A Novel Endoscope System for Position Detection and Depth Estimation of the Ureter.Journal of medical systems · 2016Article
- Cancer diagnostics and treatment: are we ready to implement PPPM?The EPMA journal · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The classification of the endoscopic appearance of superficial neoplastic lesions of the digestive mucosa aims to evaluate the risk of progression to advanced neoplasia in 3° (low, intermediate, high) and to predict appropriate treatment and corresponding surveillance. The privileged position of endoscopy results from its double impact on prevention of digestive cancer through reduction in incidence after early detection and eradication of precursors; and through reduction of mortality after detection and treatment of cancer at an early and curable stage. However the efficacy of diagnostic endoscopy still requires improvement and quality control on the following points: (1) technology, with a generalized use of the recently introduced high-resolution endoscopes. (2) diagnosis of poorly visible nonpolypoid precursors: this applies to small depressed lesions and large slightly elevated or sessile serrated and non-serrated precursors, particularly in the proximal colon. (3) treatment and training in therapeutic endoscopy, including the most recent techniques of mucosal resection of nonpolypoid lesions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.