Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23198793›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2012

Development of a decision aid to inform patients' and families' renal replacement therapy selection decisions.

Jessica M Ameling, Priscilla Auguste, Patti L Ephraim, LaPricia Lewis-Boyer, Nicole DePasquale, Raquel C Greer, Deidra C Crews, Neil R Powe, Hamid Rabb, L Ebony Boulware

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02428569 (Providing Resources to Enhance Patients' Readiness to Make Decisions About Kidney Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02428569 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Providing Resources to Enhance Patients' Readiness to Make Decisions About Kidney Disease: Partnering to Break the News, Review All Options, Weigh Pros and Cons (PREPARE NOW)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2015 to 2016Enrolled24ConditionsChronic Kidney DiseaseArmsPREPARED Decision Support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Kidney disease pathways, options and decisions: an environmental scan of international patient decision aids.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Shared Decision-Making for a Dialysis Modality.Kidney international reports · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How to tackle health literacy problems in chronic kidney disease patients? A systematic review to identify promising intervention targets and strategies.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Article
  15. Perspectives on Conservative Care in Advanced Kidney Disease: A Qualitative Study of US Patients and Family Members.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica M AmelingWelch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Priscilla Auguste
Patti L Ephraim
LaPricia Lewis-Boyer
Nicole DePasquale
Raquel C Greer
Deidra C Crews
Neil R Powe
Hamid Rabb
L Ebony Boulware
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (KL2)KL2RR025006 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2007 to 2011
$12.9M
Information and Financial Interventions for Kidney Donation in African AmericansR01DK079682 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
Clinical and Behavioral Determinants of CKD DisparitiesK23DK070757 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E · 2006 to 2010
$724k
Improving Primary Care to Narrow Racial Disparities in Chronic Kidney DiseaseK23DK094975 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GREER, RAQUEL CHARLES · 2012 to 2015
$722k
NCRR NIH HHS 5KL2RR025006NIDDK NIH HHS 3R01DK079682-03S1NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK070757NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK094975NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK079682PHS HHS K240502643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew educational resources have been developed to inform patients' renal replacement therapy (RRT) selection decisions. Patients progressing toward end stage renal disease (ESRD) must decide among multiple treatment options with varying characteristics. Complex information about treatments must be adequately conveyed to patients with different educational backgrounds and informational needs. Decisions about treatment options also require family input, as families often participate in patients' treatment and support patients' decisions. We describe the development, design, and preliminary evaluation of an informational, evidence-based, and patient-and family-centered decision aid for patients with ESRD and varying levels of health literacy, health numeracy, and cognitive function.

methodsWe designed a decision aid comprising a complementary video and informational handbook. We based our development process on data previously obtained from qualitative focus groups and systematic literature reviews. We simultaneously developed the video and handbook in "stages." For the video, stages included (1) directed interviews with culturally appropriate patients and families and preliminary script development, (2) video production, and (3) screening the video with patients and their families. For the handbook, stages comprised (1) preliminary content design, (2) a mixed-methods pilot study among diverse patients to assess comprehension of handbook material, and (3) screening the handbook with patients and their families.

resultsThe video and handbook both addressed potential benefits and trade-offs of treatment selections. The 50-minute video consisted of demographically diverse patients and their families describing their positive and negative experiences with selecting a treatment option. The video also incorporated health professionals' testimonials regarding various considerations that might influence patients' and families' treatment selections. The handbook was comprised of written words, pictures of patients and health care providers, and diagrams describing the findings and quality of scientific studies comparing treatments. The handbook text was written at a 4th to 6th grade reading level. Pilot study results demonstrated that a majority of patients could understand information presented in the handbook. Patient and families screening the nearly completed video and handbook reviewed the materials favorably.

conclusionsThis rigorously designed decision aid may help patients and families make informed decisions about their treatment options for RRT that are well aligned with their values.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesPatient ParticipationRenal Replacement TherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBaltimoreChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPamphletsPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID23198793
PMCPMC3560257
OpenAlexW2082060299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.