ArticleInternational journal of otolaryngology2012
A Pilot Study on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Children: Aided CAEPs Reflect Improved High-Frequency Audibility with Frequency Compression Hearing Aid Technology.
Article in International journal of otolaryngology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using aided cortical assessment as an objective tool to evaluate cochlear implant fitting in users with single-sided deafness.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Investigating the effect of cochlear implant usage metrics on cortical auditory-evoked potential responses in adult recipients post-implantation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Direct Elicitation of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials by Electrical Stimulation and Their Use to Verify the Most Comfortable Level of Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Users.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2023Article
- Cortical auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users: An objective method to improve speech perception.PloS one · 2022Article
- Short-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Electrically Evoked Cortical Auditory Potentials in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- A perspective on brain-behavior relationships and effects of age and hearing using speech-in-noise stimuli.Hearing research · 2018Review
- Effect of hearing aids use on speech stimulus decoding through speech-evoked ABR.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology · 2016Article
- Aided Electrophysiology Using Direct Audio Input: Effects of Amplification and Absolute Signal Level.American journal of audiology · 2016Article
- Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in (Un)aided Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Adults.Seminars in hearing · 2016Article
- Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Reveal Changes in Audibility with Nonlinear Frequency Compression in Hearing Aids for Children: Clinical Implications.Seminars in hearing · 2016Article
- Detection Rates of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials at Different Sensation Levels in Infants with Sensory/Neural Hearing Loss and Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.Seminars in hearing · 2016Article
- Anchors as Semantic Primes in Value Construction: An EEG Study of the Anchoring Effect.PloS one · 2015Article
- How neuroscience relates to hearing aid amplification.International journal of otolaryngology · 2014Review
- USES AND LIMITATIONS OF ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY WITH HEARING AIDS.Seminars in hearing · 2013Article
- Predicting Hearing aid Benefit Using Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Children With Hearing Loss.Trends in hearingArticle
- Effects of Amplification on Neural Phase Locking, Amplitude, and Latency to a Speech Syllable.Ear and hearingArticle
- Article
- Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression on ACC Amplitude and Listener Performance.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background. This study investigated whether cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) could reliably be recorded and interpreted using clinical testing equipment, to assess the effects of hearing aid technology on the CAEP. Methods. Fifteen normal hearing (NH) and five hearing impaired (HI) children were included in the study. NH children were tested unaided; HI children were tested while wearing hearing aids. CAEPs were evoked with tone bursts presented at a suprathreshold level. Presence/absence of CAEPs was established based on agreement between two independent raters. Results. Present waveforms were interpreted for most NH listeners and all HI listeners, when stimuli were measured to be at an audible level. The younger NH children were found to have significantly different waveform morphology, compared to the older children, with grand averaged waveforms differing in the later part of the time window (the N2 response). Results suggest that in some children, frequency compression hearing aid processing improved audibility of specific frequencies, leading to increased rates of detectable cortical responses in HI children. Conclusions. These findings provide support for the use of CAEPs in measuring hearing aid benefit. Further research is needed to validate aided results across a larger group of HI participants and with speech-based stimuli.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.