Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23197865›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2012

CD133+, CD166+CD44+, and CD24+CD44+ phenotypes fail to reliably identify cell populations with cancer stem cell functional features in established human colorectal cancer cell lines.

Manuele Giuseppe Muraro, Valentina Mele, Silvio Däster, Junyi Han, Michael Heberer, Giulio Cesare Spagnoli, Giandomenica Iezzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Thieno[2,3-International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. The Hyaluronan/CD44 Axis: A Double-Edged Sword in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuele Giuseppe MuraroInstitute of Surgical Research and Hospital Management, Basel, Switzerland. giezzi@uhbs.ch
Valentina Mele
Silvio Däster
Junyi Han
Michael Heberer
Giulio Cesare Spagnoli
Giandomenica Iezzi
University of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence that cancers originate from small populations of so-called cancer stem cells (CSCs), capable of surviving conventional chemotherapies and regenerating the original tumor, urges the development of novel CSC-targeted treatments. Screening of new anticancer compounds is conventionally conducted on established tumor cell lines, providing sufficient material for high-throughput studies. Whether tumor cell lines might comprise CSC populations resembling those of primary tumors, however, remains highly debated. We have analyzed the expression of defined phenotypic profiles, including CD133+, CD166+CD44+, and CD24+CD44+, reported as CSC-specific in human primary colorectal cancer (CRC), on a panel of 10 established CRC cell lines and evaluated their correlation with CSC properties. None of the putative CSC phenotypes consistently correlated with stem cell-like features, including spheroid formation ability, clonogenicity, aldehyde dehydrogenase-1 activity, and side population phenotype. Importantly, CRC cells expressing putative CSC markers did not exhibit increased survival when treated with chemotherapeutic drugs in vitro or display higher tumorigenicity in vivo. Thus, the expression of CD133 or the coexpression of CD166/CD44 or CD24/CD44 did not appear to reliably identify CSC populations in established CRC cell lines. Our findings question the suitability of cell lines for the screening of CSC-specific therapies and underline the urgency of developing novel platforms for anticancer drug discovery.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenActivated-Leukocyte Cell Adhesion MoleculeAldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 FamilyAnimalsAntigens, CDAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenColorectal NeoplasmsFluorouracilGlycoproteinsHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsIsoenzymesMiceMice, Inbred NODAC133 AntigenActivated-Leukocyte Cell Adhesion MoleculeAldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 FamilyALDH1A1 protein, humanALDH1A1 protein, mouseAntigens, CDAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenFluorouracilGlycoproteinsHyaluronan ReceptorsIsoenzymesPeptidesPROM1 protein, humanProm1 protein, mouseRetinal Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID23197865
PMCPMC3659731
OpenAlexW2165354678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.