Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23197724›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Channel noise from both slow adaptation currents and fast currents is required to explain spike-response variability in a sensory neuron.

Karin Fisch, Tilo Schwalger, Benjamin Lindner, Andreas V M Herz, Jan Benda

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Recurrence-mediated suprathreshold stochastic resonance.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fano Factor: A Potentially Useful Information.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Periodicity Pitch Perception.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karin FischDepartment Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München and Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience München, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Tilo Schwalger
Benjamin Lindner
Andreas V M Herz
Jan Benda
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Munich · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spike-timing variability has a large effect on neural information processing. However, for many systems little is known about the noise sources causing the spike-response variability. Here we investigate potential sources of spike-response variability in auditory receptor neurons of locusts, a classic insect model system. At low-spike frequencies, our data show negative interspike-interval (ISI) correlations and ISI distributions that match the inverse Gaussian distribution. These findings can be explained by a white-noise source that interacts with an adaptation current. At higher spike frequencies, more strongly peaked distributions and positive ISI correlations appear, as expected from a canonical model of suprathreshold firing driven by temporally correlated (i.e., colored) noise. Simulations of a minimal conductance-based model of the auditory receptor neuron with stochastic ion channels exclude the delayed rectifier as a possible noise source. Our analysis suggests channel noise from an adaptation current and the receptor or sodium current as main sources for the colored and white noise, respectively. By comparing the ISI statistics with generic models, we find strong evidence for two distinct noise sources. Our approach does not involve any dendritic or somatic recordings that may harm the delicate workings of many sensory systems. It could be applied to various other types of neurons, in which channel noise dominates the fluctuations that shape the neuron's spike statistics.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAuditory PathwaysComputer SimulationFemaleGrasshoppersMaleModels, NeurologicalSensory Receptor CellsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID23197724
PMCPMC6621841
OpenAlexW2149163831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.