ArticleClinical neuroradiology2013
Coiling of ruptured tiny cerebral aneurysms, feasibility, safety, and durability at midterm follow-up, and individual experience.
Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Angiographic Follow-Up for Small Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Treated by Endovascular Treatment : Follow-Up Plan and Long-Term Follow-Up Results.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2022Article
- Early Experience with the TransForm™ Occlusion Balloon Catheter: A Single-Center Study.Interventional neurology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe tiny size of cerebral aneurysms represents one of the challenging facets for endovascular treatment, with a high risk for intraoperative rupture (IOR). We report on the treatment of tiny ruptured saccular cerebral aneurysms by coil embolization. All cases were that of £ 2-3 mm aneurysms with at least one of the dimensions < 2 mm. MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween April 2008 and December 2010, we performed a retrospective analysis of nine consecutive cases of tiny aneurysms treated by coil embolization in our institution.
resultsCoil embolization was successfully performed in nine cases, whereas in one case, intraoperative rupture (IOR) of the fundus was encountered before complete obliteration of the aneurysm expected to be achieved with two coils. Complete occlusion (in n = 7 aneurysms) or near-complete immediate occlusion (in n = 2 aneurysms) was achieved. A total of 18 coils was used for coiling of the nine aneurysms, wherein five aneurysms were coiled with two coils each, two aneurysms with three coils each, and two aneurysms with only one coil each to achieve accepted results. Balloon assistance was used in three cases. Although a minimal coil projection in the parent vessel was seen in three cases, no untoward clinical complications were seen. At mean follow-up (6.7 months, interquartile range (IQR) 3-12 months), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in nine patients demonstrated persistent complete occlusion in six of the aneurysms; one aneurysm showed marked filling of the fundus, and two showed neck remnant but did not need retreatment. All patients with available follow-up were independent in day-to-day activities with a modified Rankin score (mRS) of 0 or 1.
conclusionsCoil embolization of tiny ruptured cerebral aneurysms is feasible. Careful consideration of the technical issues in treatment of such aneurysms is essential to achieve technical success while avoiding complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23197366What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.