Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23197083›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2013

Ischemic preconditioning and clinical scenarios.

Srinivasan V Narayanan, Kunjan R Dave, Miguel A Perez-Pinzon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Madder (Mediators of inflammation · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Barriers and Advances in Kidney Preservation.BioMed research international · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Srinivasan V NarayananDepartment of Neurology, Cerebral Vascular Disease Research Center, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Kunjan R Dave
Miguel A Perez-Pinzon

Funding

ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING: MECHANISMS OF NEUROPROTECTIONR01NS034773 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MIGUEL A PEREZ-PINZON · 2003 to 2026
$6.7M
MECHANISMS OF NEUROPROTECTION AGAINST CARDIAC ARRESTR01NS045676 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PEREZ-PINZON, MIGUEL A · 2004 to 2024
$5.1M
ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING: MECHANISMS OF NEUROPROTECTIONRF1NS034773 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PEREZ-PINZON, MIGUEL A · 2022 to 2022
$1.7M
Increased cerebral ischemic injury by repeated hypoglycemic episodes in diabetesR01NS073779 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DAVE, KUNJAN R · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
Mitochondria and Cerebral ischemia: intracellular signalingR01NS054147 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PEREZ-PINZON, MIGUEL A · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING--MECHANISMS OF NEUROPROTECTIONR29NS034773 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PEREZ-PINZON, MIGUEL A · 1997 to 2001
$267k
Role of Nrf2 in Ischemic Preconditioning-Induced NeuroprotectionF31NS080344 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI NARAYANAN, SRINIVASAN V · 2012 to 2014
$135k
ISCHEMIC PRECONDITIONING--ROLE OF ADENOSINER55NS034773 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI PEREZ-PINZON, MIGUEL A · 1996 to 1996
–
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS080344NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS080344-01NINDS NIH HHS NS054147NINDS NIH HHS NS073779NINDS NIH HHS NS34773NINDS NIH HHS NS45676NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS034773NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS045676NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054147NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073779NINDS NIH HHS R29 NS034773NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS034773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIschemic preconditioning (IPC) is gaining attention as a novel neuroprotective therapy and could provide an improved mechanistic understanding of tolerance to cerebral ischemia. The purpose of this article is to review the recent work in the field of IPC and its applications to clinical scenarios. RECENT

findingsThe cellular signaling pathways that are activated following IPC are now better understood and have enabled investigators to identify several IPC mimetics. Most of these studies were performed in rodents, and efficacy of these mimetics remains to be evaluated in human patients. Additionally, remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may have higher translational value than IPC. Repeated cycles of temporary ischemia in a remote organ can activate protective pathways in the target organ, including the heart and brain. Clinical trials are underway to test the efficacy of RIPC in protecting brain against subarachnoid hemorrhage. SUMMARY: IPC, RIPC, and IPC mimetics have the potential to be therapeutic in various clinical scenarios. Further understanding of IPC-induced neuroprotection pathways and utilization of clinically relevant animal models are necessary to increase the translational potential of IPC in the near future.

Indexed as

Ischemic PreconditioningAnimalsBrain IschemiaDisease Models, AnimalHumansOrganellesOxidative StressSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID23197083
PMCPMC3752400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.