Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23196149›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2012

Aesthetics in synthesis and synthetic biology.

Steven A Benner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. H-Bonded Duplexes based on a Phenylacetylene Backbone.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Sequence-Selective Formation of Synthetic H-Bonded Duplexes.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Steven A BennerFoundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, The Westheimer Institute for Science and Technology, Gainesville, FL 32601, United States. sebenner@ffame.org

Funding

Artificial Genetic SystemsR01GM081527 · NIGMS · FOUNDATION FOR APPLIED MOLECULAR EVOLUTN · PI BENNER, STEVEN A · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
Improved HIV Assays by Combining Four Innovations in Nucleic Acid ChemistryR01AI098616 · NIAID · FOUNDATION FOR APPLIED MOLECULAR EVOLUTN · PI BENNER, STEVEN A · 2012 to 2014
$1.1M
NON-STANDARD BASE PAIRS AS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH TOOLSR01GM054048 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BENNER, STEVEN A · 1996 to 2004
$1.0M
Polymerases for Sequencing by SynthesisR21HG003581 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BENNER, STEVEN A · 2004 to 2007
$796k
NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG003581NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI098616NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM054048NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physicists frequently allow aesthetics to guide their science. Chemists sometimes do. Biologists rarely do. They have encountered too frequently the consequences of the Darwinian 'hack'. The biological parts delivered by Darwinian processes are rarely simple, efficient, or elegant solutions to the biological problems that they address. Nevertheless, as humans, we seek to find aesthetics within our activities. In general, however, it is hard to distinguish what we say is beautiful from what is, in reality, utilitarian.

Indexed as

EstheticsAnimalsDNAHumansModels, MolecularSynthetic BiologyDNA

Identifiers

PMID23196149
PMCPMC3805259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.