Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23195791›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2013

Identification of evidence-based biospecimen quality-control tools: a report of the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) Biospecimen Science Working Group.

Fotini Betsou, Elaine Gunter, Judith Clements, Yvonne DeSouza, Katrina A B Goddard, Fiorella Guadagni, Wusheng Yan, Amy Skubitz, Stella Somiari, Trina Yeadon and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Biospecimens and Biobanking in Global Health.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Tissue alkalosis in cold-ischemia time.Scientific reports · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Phenotype-Driven Plasma Biobanking Strategies and Methods.Journal of personalized medicine · 2015
    Article
  20. Biobanks and personalized medicine.Clinical genetics · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fotini BetsouIntegrated Biobank of Luxembourg, Luxembourg. fay.betsou@ibbl.lu
Elaine Gunter
Judith Clements
Yvonne DeSouza
Katrina A B Goddard
Fiorella Guadagni
Wusheng Yan
Amy Skubitz
Stella Somiari
Trina Yeadon
Rodrigo Chuaqui

Funding

Virology CoreP30AI027763 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STEVEN Grant DEEKS · 1988 to 2026
$93.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Control of biospecimen quality that is linked to processing is one of the goals of biospecimen science. Consensus is lacking, however, regarding optimal sample quality-control (QC) tools (ie, markers and assays). The aim of this review was to identify QC tools, both for fluid and solid-tissue samples, based on a comprehensive and critical literature review. The most readily applicable tools are those with a known threshold for the preanalytical variation and a known reference range for the QC analyte. Only a few meaningful markers were identified that meet these criteria, such as CD40L for assessing serum exposure at high temperatures and VEGF for assessing serum freeze-thawing. To fully assess biospecimen quality, multiple QC markers are needed. Here we present the most promising biospecimen QC tools that were identified.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBiomedical ResearchEvidence-Based MedicineHumansQuality ControlReference ValuesSpecimen HandlingBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23195791
PMCPMC5707193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.