Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23194815›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2013

Comparison of psychophysical, electrophysiological, and fMRI assessment of visual contrast responses in patients with schizophrenia.

Daniel J Calderone, Antígona Martinez, Vance Zemon, Matthew J Hoptman, George Hu, Jade E Watkins, Daniel C Javitt, Pamela D Butler

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Alterations of the occipital lobe in schizophrenia.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Impaired Contour Object Perception in Psychosis.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Impaired contour object perception in psychosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Dissociable Neural Mechanisms Underlie the Effects of Attention on Visual Appearance and Response Bias.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Perceptual Functioning.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Visual Evoked Potential Abnormalities in Phelan-McDermid Syndrome.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J CalderoneNathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Road, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA. dcalderone@nki.rfmh.org
Antígona Martinez
Vance Zemon
Matthew J Hoptman
George Hu
Jade E Watkins
Daniel C Javitt
Pamela D Butler
Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research · USNew York University · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USCity University of New York · US

Funding

The Conte Center for Schizophrenia ResearchP50MH086385 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI JAVITT, DANIEL C. · 2009 to 2013
$10.7M
3.0 Tesla MRI for Psychiatric ApplicationsS10RR022972 · NCRR · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI BRANCH, CRAIG A · 2007 to 2007
$2.0M
Methods for Sensory Assessment in SchizophreniaR01MH084848 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KAHN, PAMELA BUTLER · 2008 to 2011
$1.5M
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR022972NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH086385NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception has been identified by the NIMH-sponsored Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (CNTRICS) group as a useful domain for assessing cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia. Specific measures of contrast gain derived from recordings of steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEP) have demonstrated neural deficits within the visual pathways of patients with schizophrenia. Psychophysical measures of contrast sensitivity have also shown functional loss in these patients. In the current study, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used in conjunction with ssVEP and contrast sensitivity testing to elucidate the neural underpinnings of these deficits. During fMRI scanning, participants viewed 1) the same low and higher spatial frequency stimuli used in the psychophysical contrast sensitivity task, at both individual detection threshold contrast and at a high contrast; and 2) the same stimuli used in the ssVEP paradigm, which were designed to be biased toward either the magnocellular or parvocellular visual pathway. Patients showed significant impairment in contrast sensitivity at both spatial frequencies in the psychophysical task, but showed reduced occipital activation volume for low, but not higher, spatial frequency at the low and high contrasts tested in the magnet. As expected, patients exhibited selective deficits under the magnocellular-biased ssVEP condition. However, occipital lobe fMRI responses demonstrated the same general pattern for magnocellular- and parvocellular-biased stimuli across groups. These results indicate dissociation between the fMRI measures and the psychophysical/ssVEP measures. These latter measures appear to have greater value for the functional assessment of the contrast deficits explored here.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivitySchizophrenic PsychologyAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSchizophreniaVision DisordersVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID23194815
PMCPMC3544989
OpenAlexW2038676112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.