Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23194318›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2013

Methylmercury production in estuarine sediments: role of organic matter.

Amina T Schartup, Robert P Mason, Prentiss H Balcom, Terill A Hollweg, Celia Y Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Recent advance of microbial mercury methylation in the environment.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Optimization of pretreatment procedure for MeHg determination in sediments and its applications.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Methylmercury bioaccumulation in an urban estuary: Delaware River USA.Estuaries and coasts : journal of the Estuarine Research Federation · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amina T SchartupDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA. schartup@hsph.harvard.edu
Robert P Mason
Prentiss H Balcom
Terill A Hollweg
Celia Y Chen

Funding

VARIATION IN BIOACCUMULATION AND BIOMAGNIFICATION OF METALS IN NORTHERN US LAKESP42ES007373 · NIEHS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI CHEN, CELIA Y · 1995 to 2019
$52.0M
Climate impact on coastal ecosystem methylmercury: human exposure implicationsR01ES021950 · NIEHS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI CHEN, CELIA Y · 2012 to 2014
$1.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES007373NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES021950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methylmercury (MeHg) affects wildlife and human health mainly through marine fish consumption. In marine systems, MeHg is formed from inorganic mercury (Hg(II)) species primarily in sediments, then accumulates and biomagnifies in the food web. Most of the fish consumed in the United States are from estuarine and marine systems, highlighting the importance of understanding MeHg formation in these productive regions. Sediment organic matter has been shown to limit mercury methylation in estuarine ecosystems, as a result it is often described as the primary control over MeHg production. In this paper, we explore the role of organic matter by looking at the effects of its changing sediment concentrations on the methylation rates across multiple estuaries. We measured sedimentary MeHg production at eleven estuarine sites that were selected for their contrasting biogeochemical characteristics, mercury (Hg) content, and location in the Northeastern U.S. (ME, NH, CT, NY, and NJ). Sedimentary total Hg concentrations ranged across 5 orders of magnitude, increasing in concentration from the pristine, sandy sediments of Wells (ME), to industrially contaminated areas such as Portsmouth (NH) and Hackensack (NJ). We find that methylation rates are the highest at locations with high Hg content (relative to carbon), and that organic matter does not hinder mercury methylation in estuaries.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringFishesGeologic SedimentsHumansHumic SubstancesMercuryMethylationMethylmercury CompoundsWater Pollutants, ChemicalHumic SubstancesMercuryMethylmercury CompoundsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID23194318
PMCPMC4066882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.