ReviewJournal of biomedicine & biotechnology2012
How to deal with the upcoming challenges in GMO detection in food and feed.
Review in Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable Nanotechnology Approaches for Rapid Food Contaminant Detection and Future Food Safety Systems.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multiplex PCR Fluorescence Method for Detection of Genetically Modified Maize Strains.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Detection and identification of authorized and unauthorized GMOs using high-throughput sequencing with the support of a sequence-based GMO database.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2022Article
- CRISPR/Cas12a-based technology: A powerful tool for biosensing in food safety.Trends in food science & technology · 2022Review
- A Real-Time Quantitative PCR Method Specific for Detection and Quantification of the First Commercialized Genome-Edited Plant.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- DUGMO: tool for the detection of unknown genetically modified organisms with high-throughput sequencing data for pure bacterial samples.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Identification of an unauthorized genetically modified bacteria in food enzyme through whole-genome sequencing.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Transgenic Plant Detection Using an AuNPs Based SPR Biosensor.Biosensors · 2019Article
- Development of event-specific qPCR detection methods for genetically modified alfalfa events J101, J163 and KK179.Biomolecular detection and quantification · 2019Article
- Nanopore sequencing technology: a new route for the fast detection of unauthorized GMO.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Molecular Approaches for High Throughput Detection and Quantification of Genetically Modified Crops: A Review.Frontiers in plant science · 2017Review
- Event-specific detection of transgenic potato AV43-6-G7 using real-time and digital PCR methods.BMC biotechnology · 2016Article
- Trends and advances in food analysis by real-time polymerase chain reaction.Journal of food science and technology · 2016Review
- Integrated DNA walking system to characterize a broad spectrum of GMOs in food/feed matrices.BMC biotechnology · 2015Article
- Current and new approaches in GMO detection: challenges and solutions.BioMed research international · 2015Review
- New multiplex PCR methods for rapid screening of genetically modified organisms in foods.Frontiers in microbiology · 2015Article
- Development and application of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for rapid visual detection of cry2Ab and cry3A genes in genetically-modified crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Article
- Development of a novel reference plasmid for accurate quantification of genetically modified Kefeng6 rice DNA in food and feed samples.BioMed research international · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biotech crops are the fastest adopted crop technology in the history of modern agriculture. The commercialisation of GMO is in many countries strictly regulated laying down the need for traceability and labelling. To comply with these legislations, detection methods are needed. To date, GM events have been developed by the introduction of a transgenic insert (i.e., promoter, coding sequence, terminator) into the plant genome and real-time PCR is the detection method of choice. However, new types of genetic elements will be used to construct new GMO and new crops will be transformed. Additionally, the presence of unauthorised GMO in food and feed samples might increase in the near future. To enable enforcement laboratories to continue detecting all GM events and to obtain an idea of the possible presence of unauthorised GMO in a food and feed sample, an intensive screening will become necessary. A pragmatic, cost-effective, and time-saving approach is presented here together with an overview of the evolution of the GMO and the upcoming needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.