Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23193269›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2013

MicroScope--an integrated microbial resource for the curation and comparative analysis of genomic and metabolic data.

David Vallenet, Eugeni Belda, Alexandra Calteau, Stéphane Cruveiller, Stefan Engelen, Aurélie Lajus, François Le Fèvre, Cyrille Longin, Damien Mornico, David Roche and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 246 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
246citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

246 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Engineering the MarineMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The exceptional form and function of the giant bacteriumProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Cooperation and cheating orchestrate Vibrio assemblages and polymicrobial synergy in oysters infected with OsHV-1 virus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. "Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. In Silico Study of Cell Surface Structures ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Molecular and Genomic Insights ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

186 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

David VallenetCEA, Institut de Génomique, Genoscope, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, 91057 Evry, France. vallenet@genoscope.cns.fr
Eugeni Belda
Alexandra Calteau
Stéphane Cruveiller
Stefan Engelen
Aurélie Lajus
François Le Fèvre
Cyrille Longin
Damien Mornico
David Roche
Zoé Rouy
Gregory Salvignol
Claude Scarpelli
Adam Alexander Thil Smith
Marion Weiman
Claudine Médigue

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroScope is an integrated platform dedicated to both the methodical updating of microbial genome annotation and to comparative analysis. The resource provides data from completed and ongoing genome projects (automatic and expert annotations), together with data sources from post-genomic experiments (i.e. transcriptomics, mutant collections) allowing users to perfect and improve the understanding of gene functions. MicroScope (http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/agc/microscope) combines tools and graphical interfaces to analyse genomes and to perform the manual curation of gene annotations in a comparative context. Since its first publication in January 2006, the system (previously named MaGe for Magnifying Genomes) has been continuously extended both in terms of data content and analysis tools. The last update of MicroScope was published in 2009 in the Database journal. Today, the resource contains data for >1600 microbial genomes, of which ∼300 are manually curated and maintained by biologists (1200 personal accounts today). Expert annotations are continuously gathered in the MicroScope database (∼50 000 a year), contributing to the improvement of the quality of microbial genomes annotations. Improved data browsing and searching tools have been added, original tools useful in the context of expert annotation have been developed and integrated and the website has been significantly redesigned to be more user-friendly. Furthermore, in the context of the European project Microme (Framework Program 7 Collaborative Project), MicroScope is becoming a resource providing for the curation and analysis of both genomic and metabolic data. An increasing number of projects are related to the study of environmental bacterial (meta)genomes that are able to metabolize a large variety of chemical compounds that may be of high industrial interest.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticGenome, BacterialBacteriaEnzymesEvolution, MolecularGene Expression ProfilingGenome, ArchaealGenomicsInternetMetabolic Networks and PathwaysSoftwareSyntenySystems IntegrationEnzymes

Identifiers

PMID23193269
PMCPMC3531135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.