ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2013
Defining and predicting structurally conserved regions in protein superfamilies.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolving strategies for virus discovery.Microbial genomics · 2026Review
- ECOD: Classification of domains in AFDB Swiss-Prot structure predictions.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Evolutionarily diverse caveolins share a common structural framework built around amphipathic disks.The Journal of cell biology · 2025Article
- A sequence-based method for predicting extant fold switchers that undergo α-helix ↔ β-strand transitions.Biopolymers · 2021Article
- A sequence family database built on ECOD structural domains.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Revisiting Myosin Families Through Large-scale Sequence Searches Leads to the Discovery of New Myosins.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2016Article
- Genome-wide identification of Calcineurin B-Like (CBL) gene family of plants reveals novel conserved motifs and evolutionary aspects in calcium signaling events.BMC plant biology · 2015Article
- Article
- Signal transduction: From the atomic age to the post-genomic era.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe structures of homologous proteins are generally better conserved than their sequences. This phenomenon is demonstrated by the prevalence of structurally conserved regions (SCRs) even in highly divergent protein families. Defining SCRs requires the comparison of two or more homologous structures and is affected by their availability and divergence, and our ability to deduce structurally equivalent positions among them. In the absence of multiple homologous structures, it is necessary to predict SCRs of a protein using information from only a set of homologous sequences and (if available) a single structure. Accurate SCR predictions can benefit homology modelling and sequence alignment.
resultsUsing pairwise DaliLite alignments among a set of homologous structures, we devised a simple measure of structural conservation, termed structural conservation index (SCI). SCI was used to distinguish SCRs from non-SCRs. A database of SCRs was compiled from 386 SCOP superfamilies containing 6489 protein domains. Artificial neural networks were then trained to predict SCRs with various features deduced from a single structure and homologous sequences. Assessment of the predictions via a 5-fold cross-validation method revealed that predictions based on features derived from a single structure perform similarly to ones based on homologous sequences, while combining sequence and structural features was optimal in terms of accuracy (0.755) and Matthews correlation coefficient (0.476). These results suggest that even without information from multiple structures, it is still possible to effectively predict SCRs for a protein. Finally, inspection of the structures with the worst predictions pinpoints difficulties in SCR definitions. AVAILABILITY: The SCR database and the prediction server can be found at http://prodata.swmed.edu/SCR. CONTACT: 91huangi@gmail.com or grishin@chop.swmed.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.