Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23193121›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2013

Genetic relatedness to sisters' children has been underestimated.

Alan R Rogers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The expendable male hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  3. A worldwide view of matriliny: using cross-cultural analyses to shed light on human kinship systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  4. Lineal kinship organization in cross-specific perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  5. One piece of the matrilineal puzzle: the socioecology of maternal uncle investment.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  6. Inclusive fitness for in-laws.Biology letters · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Not leaving home: grandmothers and male dispersal in a duolocal human society.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alan R RogersDepartment of Anthropology, University of Utah, 270 S 1400 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. rogers@anthro.utah.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Males of many species help in the care and provisioning of offspring, and these investments often correlate with genetic relatedness. For example, many human males invest in the children of sisters, and this is especially so where men are less likely to share genes with children of wives. Although this makes qualitative sense, it has been difficult to support quantitatively. The prevailing model predicts investment in children of sisters only when paternity confidence falls below 0.268. This value is often seen as too low to be credible; so investment in sisters' children represents an unsolved problem. I show here that the prevailing model rests on a series of restrictive assumptions that underestimate relatedness to sisters' children. For this reason, it understates the fitness payoff to men who invest in these children. This effect can be substantial, especially in societies with low confidence in paternity. But this effect cannot be estimated solely from confidence in paternity. One must also estimate the probability that two siblings share the same father.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPaternal BehaviorSelection, GeneticSibling RelationsGame TheoryGenetic FitnessHumansMalePaternityProbability

Identifiers

PMID23193121
PMCPMC3574401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.