ArticleBMJ open2012
A cross-sectional survey and service evaluation of simple telehealth in primary care: what do patients think?
Article in BMJ open, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Healthy Hearts via Live Videoconferencing: An Exercise and Diet Intervention in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Trial
- Patients' experiences of remote communication after pacemaker implant: The NORDLAND study.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Implementing home blood glucose and blood pressure telemonitoring in primary care practices for patients with diabetes: lessons learned.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2014Trial
- Patient and clinician perceptions of telehealth in musculoskeletal physiotherapy services - A systematic review of the evidence-base.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Citizens' perspectives on relocating care: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Effects of technology-enabled blood pressure monitoring in primary care: A quasi-experimental trial.Journal of telemedicine and telecare · 2024Article
- Text Messages to Support Caregivers in a Health Care System: Development and Pilot and National Rollout Evaluation.Journal of participatory medicine · 2022Article
- Patients' Experiences and Communication with Teledermatology versus Face-to-Face Dermatology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Improving outcomes among young adults with type 1 diabetes: the D1 Now pilot cluster randomised controlled trial.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2022Article
- Telehealth in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2022Article
- Does the Integration of Telehealth into Occupational Therapy Practice Impact Clinical Outcomes for Hand and Upper Limb Rehabilitation? A Matched Case Control Study.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2022Article
- Supporting self-management and clinic attendance in young adults with type 1 diabetes: development of the D1 Now intervention.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2021Article
- 'It's not hands-on therapy, so it's very limited': Telehealth use and views among allied health clinicians during the coronavirus pandemic.Musculoskeletal science & practice · 2021Article
- Article
- Telehealth: improving maternity services by modern technology.BMJ open quality · 2020Article
- Provider- and Patient-Related Barriers to and Facilitators of Digital Health Technology Adoption for Hypertension Management: Scoping Review.JMIR cardio · 2019Article
- Cuff-Less Methods for Blood Pressure Telemonitoring.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Review
- Making technology-enabled health care work in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018Article
- The CRADLE vital signs alert: qualitative evaluation of a novel device designed for use in pregnancy by healthcare workers in low-resource settings.Reproductive health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the patient experience of using a simple telehealth strategy to manage hypertension in adults.
designAs part of a pragmatic service evaluation, the acceptability of, satisfaction with and ease of use of a simple telehealth strategy was determined via text, cross-sectional questionnaire survey administered by telephone, case studies, discussion groups and informal feedback from practices. This simple telehealth approach required patients to take home blood pressure (BP) readings and text them to a secure server ('Florence') for immediate automatic analysis and individual healthcare professional review.
participants124 intervention patients who used the Florence system.
setting10 volunteer general practitioner's (GP) practices in Stoke on Trent, UK, with poor health and high levels of material deprivation took part.
resultsPatient satisfaction was high. In particular, patients found the system easy to use, were very satisfied about the feedback from their GP regarding their BP readings, found the advice sent via Florence useful and preferred to send BP readings using Florence rather than having to go to the practice monthly to get BP checked. Overall satisfaction with the system was 4.81/5.00 at week 13 of the programme. Other advantages of being enrolled with Florence were improved education about hypertension, a greater feeling of support and companionship and flexibility which allowed self-care to occur at a time that suited the patient rather than their practice.
conclusionsThis simple telehealth strategy for managing hypertension in the community was met with high levels of patient satisfaction and feelings of control and support. This management approach should thus be considered for widespread implementation for clinical management of hypertension and other long-term conditions involving monitoring of patients' bodily measurements and symptoms as a large number of meaningful readings can be obtained from many patients in a prompt, efficient, interactive and acceptable way.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.