Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23192240›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2013

Cross-sectional study of the ossification center of the C1-S5 vertebral bodies.

Michał Szpinda, Mariusz Baumgart, Anna Szpinda, Alina Woźniak, Bogdan Małkowski, Marcin Wiśniewski, Celestyna Mila-Kierzenkowska, Dariusz Króliczewski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar spine development in vivo: a retrospective study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Three-dimensional growth dynamics of the liver in the human fetus.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michał SzpindaDepartment of Normal Anatomy, The Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, The Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Karłowicza 24 Street, 85-092, Bydgoszcz, Poland. kizanat@cm.umk.pl
Mariusz Baumgart
Anna Szpinda
Alina Woźniak
Bogdan Małkowski
Marcin Wiśniewski
Celestyna Mila-Kierzenkowska
Dariusz Króliczewski
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PLCollegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeKnowledge on the normative growth of the spine is relevant in the prenatal detection of its abnormalities. This study describes the size of the ossification center of C1-S5 vertebral bodies. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing CT, digital-image analysis, and statistics, the size of the ossification center of C1-S5 vertebral bodies in 55 spontaneously aborted human fetuses aged 17-30 weeks was examined.

resultsNo sex significant differences were found. The body ossification centers were found within the entire presacral spine and in 85.5 % of S1, in 76.4 % of S2, in 67.3 % of S3, in 40.0 % of S4, and in 14.5 % of S5. All the values for the atlas were sharply smaller than for the axis. The mean transverse diameter of the body ossification center gradually increased from the axis to T12 vertebra, so as to stabilize through L1-L3 vertebrae, and finally was intensively decreasing to S5 vertebra. There was a gradual increase in sagittal diameter of the body ossification center from the axis to T5 vertebra and its stabilization for T6-T9 vertebrae. Afterward, an alternate progression was observed: a decrease in values for T10-T12 vertebrae, an increase in values for L1-L2 vertebrae, and finally a decrease in values for L3-S5 vertebrae. The values of cross-sectional area of ossification centers were gradually increasing from the axis to L2 vertebra and then started decreasing to S5 vertebra. The following cross-sectional areas were approximately equivalent to each other: for L5 and T3-T5, and for S4 and C1. The volumetric growth of the body ossification center gradually increased from the axis to L3 vertebra and then sharply decreased from L4 to S5.

conclusionsNo male-female differences are found in the size of the body ossification centers of the spine. The growth dynamics for morphometric parameters of the body ossification centers of the spine follow similarly with gestational age.

Indexed as

Fetal DevelopmentOsteogenesisCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansMaleReference ValuesSex CharacteristicsSpine

Identifiers

PMID23192240
PMCPMC3689470
OpenAlexW2038985119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.