Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23190792›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2012

ASAP ECMO: Antibiotic, Sedative and Analgesic Pharmacokinetics during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: a multi-centre study to optimise drug therapy during ECMO.

Kiran Shekar, Jason A Roberts, Susan Welch, Hergen Buscher, Sam Rudham, Fay Burrows, Sussan Ghassabian, Steven C Wallis, Bianca Levkovich, Vin Pellegrino and 9 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05406492 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Population Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics, Sedative and Analgesics, and Antiplatelet Agents During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorGachon University Gil Medical CenterRan2019 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsPharmacokinetics, Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationArmsResidual blood
NCT06338345 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Pharmacokinetics and Modelling of Beta-Lactam in Patients Undergoing Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2024 to 2028Enrolled225ConditionsCardiogenic Shock, Post-cardiac Surgery, Cardiac Arrest, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ComplicationArmsTherapeutic drug monitoring of beta-lactam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Kiran ShekarCritical Care Research Group, Adult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital and The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. kiran_shekar@health.qld.gov.au.
Jason A Roberts
Susan Welch
Hergen Buscher
Sam Rudham
Fay Burrows
Sussan Ghassabian
Steven C Wallis
Bianca Levkovich
Vin Pellegrino
Shay McGuinness
Rachael Parke
Eileen Gilder
Adrian G Barnett
James Walsham
Daniel V Mullany
Yoke L Fung
Maree T Smith
John F Fraser
The University of Queensland · AUSt Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUAuckland City Hospital · NZPrince Charles Hospital · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelled

backgroundGiven the expanding scope of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and its variable impact on drug pharmacokinetics as observed in neonatal studies, it is imperative that the effects of the device on the drugs commonly prescribed in the intensive care unit (ICU) are further investigated. Currently, there are no data to confirm the appropriateness of standard drug dosing in adult patients on ECMO. Ineffective drug regimens in these critically ill patients can seriously worsen patient outcomes. This study was designed to describe the pharmacokinetics of the commonly used antibiotic, analgesic and sedative drugs in adult patients receiving ECMO. METHODS/

designThis is a multi-centre, open-label, descriptive pharmacokinetic (PK) study. Eligible patients will be adults treated with ECMO for severe cardiac and/or respiratory failure at five Intensive Care Units in Australia and New Zealand. Patients will receive the study drugs as part of their routine management. Blood samples will be taken from indwelling catheters to investigate plasma concentrations of several antibiotics (ceftriaxone, meropenem, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, piperacillin-tazobactum, ticarcillin-clavulunate, linezolid, fluconazole, voriconazole, caspofungin, oseltamivir), sedatives and analgesics (midazolam, morphine, fentanyl, propofol, dexmedetomidine, thiopentone). The PK of each drug will be characterised to determine the variability of PK in these patients and to develop dosing guidelines for prescription during ECMO. DISCUSSION: The evidence-based dosing algorithms generated from this analysis can be evaluated in later clinical studies. This knowledge is vitally important for optimising pharmacotherapy in these most severely ill patients to maximise the opportunity for therapeutic success and minimise the risk of therapeutic failure.

trial registrationACTRN12612000559819.

Identifiers

PMID23190792
PMCPMC3543712
OpenAlexW1529014011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.