Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23190475›Full record

ReviewBiology direct2012

Bioinformatics clouds for big data manipulation.

Lin Dai, Xin Gao, Yan Guo, Jingfa Xiao, Zhang Zhang

Abstract readEvaluation StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology direct, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cloud Computing Enabled Big Multi-Omics Data Analytics.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. -Omic and Electronic Health Record Big Data Analytics for Precision Medicine.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Precision Medicine: What Challenges Are We Facing?Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lin DaiCAS Key Laboratory of Genome Sciences and Information, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.7 Beitucheng West Road, Building G, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, China.
Xin Gao
Yan Guo
Jingfa Xiao
Zhang Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAs advances in life sciences and information technology bring profound influences on bioinformatics due to its interdisciplinary nature, bioinformatics is experiencing a new leap-forward from in-house computing infrastructure into utility-supplied cloud computing delivered over the Internet, in order to handle the vast quantities of biological data generated by high-throughput experimental technologies. Albeit relatively new, cloud computing promises to address big data storage and analysis issues in the bioinformatics field. Here we review extant cloud-based services in bioinformatics, classify them into Data as a Service (DaaS), Software as a Service (SaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), and present our perspectives on the adoption of cloud computing in bioinformatics. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Frank Eisenhaber, Igor Zhulin, and Sandor Pongor.

Indexed as

InternetAccess to InformationComputational BiologyData CollectionInformation Storage and RetrievalSoftwareUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID23190475
PMCPMC3533974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.