Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23189161›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Performance of LBSap vaccine after intradermal challenge with L. infantum and saliva of Lu. longipalpis: immunogenicity and parasitological evaluation.

Bruno Mendes Roatt, Rodrigo Dian de Oliveira Aguiar-Soares, Juliana Vitoriano-Souza, Wendel Coura-Vital, Samuel Leôncio Braga, Rodrigo Corrêa-Oliveira, Olindo Assis Martins-Filho, Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho, Marta de Lana, Nelder Figueiredo Gontijo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nanoformulations withVaccines · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Peptide Vaccines for Leishmaniasis.Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bruno Mendes RoattLaboratório de Imunopatologia, Núcleo de Pesquisas em Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Rodrigo Dian de Oliveira Aguiar-Soares
Juliana Vitoriano-Souza
Wendel Coura-Vital
Samuel Leôncio Braga
Rodrigo Corrêa-Oliveira
Olindo Assis Martins-Filho
Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho
Marta de Lana
Nelder Figueiredo Gontijo
Marcos José Marques
Rodolfo Cordeiro Giunchetti
Alexandre Barbosa Reis
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Alfenas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, the search for new vaccines against canine visceral leishmaniasis has intensified. However, the pattern related to immune protection during long periods after experimental infection in vaccine trials is still not fully understood. Herein, we investigated the immunogenicity and parasitological levels after intradermal challenge with Leishmania infantum plus salivary gland extract in dogs immunized with a vaccine composed of L. braziliensis antigens plus saponin as an adjuvant (LBSap vaccine). The LBSap vaccine elicited higher levels of total anti-Leishmania IgG as well as both IgG1 and IgG2. Furthermore, dogs vaccinated had increased levels of lymphocytes, particularly circulating B cells (CD21(+)) and both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes. LBSap also elicited an intense in vitro cell proliferation associated with higher levels of CD4(+) T lymphocytes specific for vaccine soluble antigen and soluble lysate of L. infantum antigen even 885 days after experimental challenge. Furthermore, LBSap vaccinated dogs presented high IFN-γ and low IL-10 and TGF-β1 expression in spleen with significant reduction of parasite load in this tissue. Overall, our results validate the potential of LBSap vaccine to protect against L. infantum experimental infection and strongly support further evaluation of efficiency of LBSap against CVL in natural infection conditions.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, CDAntigens, ProtozoanB-LymphocytesCytokinesDog DiseasesDogsFemaleHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIImmunity, HumoralImmunoglobulin GImmunophenotypingLeishmania infantumLeishmaniasis VaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, CDAntigens, ProtozoanCytokinesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIImmunoglobulin GLeishmaniasis VaccinesSaponins

Identifiers

PMID23189161
PMCPMC3506642
OpenAlexW2122510929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.