GuidelineJournal of genetic counseling2013
NSGC practice guideline: risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
Guideline in Journal of genetic counseling, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cancer Predisposition Genes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs): a Review Paper from the Italian AYA Working Group.Current oncology reports · 2022Pooled it
- Maternal Communication of BRCA Risk to Adolescent and Young Adult Children: Implications for Supportive Care Intervention.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Revolutionising Cardio-Oncology Care with Precision Genomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Development of a novel prediction model for carriage of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant in Japanese patients with breast cancer based on Japanese organization of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer registry data.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Exploring the impact of the reclassification of a hereditary cancer syndrome gene variant: emerging themes from a qualitative study.Journal of community genetics · 2023Article
- Examining interprofessional collaboration in oncogenetic service delivery models for hereditary cancers: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Improving our model of cascade testing for hereditary cancer risk by leveraging patient peer support: a concept report.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2021Article
- How patients deal with an ambiguous medical test: Decision-making after genetic testing.Patient education and counseling · 2021Article
- Development and early implementation of an Accessible, Relational, Inclusive and Actionable approach to genetic counseling: The ARIA model.Patient education and counseling · 2021Article
- A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Consent for Genetic Testing Using an Oncologist- or Genetic Counselor-Mediated Model of Care.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
- Organizational readiness to implement population-based screening and genetic service delivery for hereditary cancer prevention and control.Journal of genetic counseling · 2020Article
- Improving recommendations for genomic medicine: building an evolutionary process from clinical practice advisory documents to guidelines.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Review
- Risk Assessment and Genetic Testing for Inherited Gastrointestinal Syndromes.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019Article
- Pharmacogenomic Testing: Clinical Evidence and Implementation Challenges.Journal of personalized medicine · 2019Review
- Evaluating BRCA mutation risk predictive models in a Chinese cohort in Taiwan.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Multi gene panel testing for hereditary breast cancer - is it ready to be used?Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2019Review
- Risk perception and screening behavior of Filipino women at risk for breast cancer: implications for cancer genetic counseling.Journal of community genetics · 2019Article
- Canadian genetic healthcare professionals' attitudes towards discussing private pay options with patients.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2019Article
- Inequities in genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer: implications for public health practice.Journal of community genetics · 2019Review
- Evaluating the role of public health in implementation of genomics-related recommendations: a case study of hereditary cancers using the CDC Science Impact Framework.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this document is to present a current and comprehensive set of practice recommendations for effective genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The intended audience is genetic counselors and other health professionals who care for individuals with, or at increased risk of, hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23188549What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.