Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23187814›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2013

The circadian clock: a framework linking metabolism, epigenetics and neuronal function.

Selma Masri, Paolo Sassone-Corsi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Circadian Clock and Body Temperature.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Metabolic effects of air pollution exposure and reversibility.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Selma MasriDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Center for Epigenetics and Metabolism, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA.
Paolo Sassone-Corsi

Funding

SIRT1 and MLL1 Interplay in circadian clock functionR21AG041504 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SASSONE-CORSI, PAOLO · 2011 to 2012
$421k
Not Only SIRT1: A Role for Nuclear SIRT6 in Circadian ControlR21AG043745 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI SASSONE-CORSI, PAOLO · 2012 to 2013
$412k
The Role of SIRT6 in Modulating Circadian Gene ExpressionF32GM097899 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MASRI, SELMA · 2011 to 2012
$105k
NIA NIH HHS AG041504NIA NIH HHS R21 AG041504NIA NIH HHS R21 AG043745NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM097899NIGMS NIH HHS GM097899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circadian clock machinery is responsible for biological timekeeping on a systemic level. The central clock system controls peripheral clocks through a number of output cues that synchronize the system as a whole. There is growing evidence that changing cellular metabolic states have important effects on circadian rhythms and can thereby influence neuronal function and disease. Epigenetic control has also been implicated in the modulation of biological timekeeping, and cellular metabolism and epigenetic state seem to be closely linked. We discuss the idea that cellular metabolic state and epigenetic mechanisms might work through the circadian clock to regulate neuronal function and influence disease states.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsAnimalsCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmHumansModels, BiologicalNeurons

Identifiers

PMID23187814
PMCPMC5720680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.